Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card, 2010–11


For Ralston Middle School

Address: 2675 Ralston Ave., Belmont, CA, 94002-1216 Phone: (650) 637-4880
Principal: Jennifer Kollmann, Principal Grade Span: 6-8
This executive summary of the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) is intended to provide parents and community members with a quick snapshot of information related to individual public schools. Most data presented in this report are reported for the 2010–11 school year. School finances and school completion data are reported for the 2009–10 school year. Contact information, facilities, curriculum and instructional materials, and select teacher data are reported for the 2011–12 school year. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should review the entire SARC or contact the school principal or the district office.

About This School

Ralston Middle School is the cornerstone of the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District. Six elementary schools send their students to Ralston and, as a result, the student body is a true reflection of the diversity of this small mid-Peninsula community. With 900 students in the 6th, 7th and 8th grades, Ralston teaches students with a wide range of ability who represent a wonderful spectrum of cultures and nationalities.

Student Enrollment

Group Enrollment
Number of students 905
Black or African American 2.8%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2%
Asian 24.8%
Filipino 4.3%
Hispanic or Latino 9.6%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.7%
White 57.1%
Two or More Races 0.6%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 1.5%
English Learners 8.6%
Students with Disabilities 0.0%


Teachers

Indicator Teachers
Teachers with full credential 41
Teachers without full credential 0
Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0
Total Teacher Misassignments 0

Student Performance

Subject Students Proficient and Above on STAR* Program Results
English-Language Arts 82%
Mathematics 73%
Science 88%
History-Social Science 77%
*Standardized Testing and Reporting Program assessments used for accountability purposes include the California Standards Tests, the California Modified Assessment, and the California Alternate Performance Assessment.

Academic Progress*

Indicator Result
2011 Growth API Score (from 2011 Growth API Report)
900
Statewide Rank (from 2010 Base API Report)
10
Met All 2011 AYP Requirements
no
Number of AYP Criteria Met Out of the Total Number of Criteria Possible
Met 15 of 17
2011–12 Program Improvement Status (PI Year)
N/A
*The Academic Performance Index is required under state law. Adequate Yearly Progress is required by federal law.

School Facilities

Summary of Most Recent Site Inspection

Ralston Middle School has regular fire and safety inspections by the Belmont San Carlos Fire Department and health inspections by the San Mateo County Health Department. We welcome their input and implement their suggestions.

Cleaning Standards: The District has adopted cleaning standards for each school, and a copy of these is available in the principal’s office. The principal works daily with the custodial staff to develop and implement cleaning practices that ensure a clean and safe school campus.

Maintenance and Repair: District maintenance staff, assisted as necessary by outside contractors, keeps the school in good repair. Work orders are completed in a timely manner, and tracked on a computerized system of record keeping, which also allows priority to be assigned to emergency repairs.

Repairs Needed

The roofs will be replaced in the future. Areas of the courtyard planter boxes were repaired. Areas of the courtyard were repaved.

Corrective Actions Taken or Planned

The electrical cage was completely replaced in the summer of 2008. The roofs will be replaced in the future.

Curriculum and Instructional Materials

Core Curriculum Area Pupils Who Lack Textbooks and Instructional Materials
Reading/Language Arts 0%
Mathematics 0%
Science 0%
History-Social Science 0%
Foreign Language 0%
Health 0%
Visual and Performing Arts N/A
Science Laboratory Equipment 0%

School Finances

Level Expenditures Per Pupil (Unrestricted Sources Only)
School Site
$5,038
District
$6,801
State
$5,455

School Completion

Indicator Result
Graduation Rate (if applicable) 100%

School Accountability Report Card


Reported Using Data from the 2010–11 School Year


Published During 2011–12

Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school.

I. Data and Access

Ed-Data Partnership Web Site

Ed-Data is a partnership of the CDE, EdSource, and the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) that provides extensive financial, demographic, and performance information about California’s public kindergarten through grade twelve school districts and schools.

DataQuest

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., state Academic Performance Index [API], federal Adequate Yearly Progress [AYP]), test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.

Internet Access

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.

II. About This School

Contact Information (School Year 2011–12)

School District
School Name Ralston Middle District Name Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary
Street 2675 Ralston Ave. Phone Number (650) 637-4800
City, State, Zip Belmont, CA, 94002-1216 Web Site www.brssd.org
Phone Number (650) 637-4880 Superintendent Emerita Orta-Camilleri
Principal Jennifer Kollmann, Principal E-mail Address eorta-camilleri@brssd.org
E-mail Address jkollmann@brssd.org CDS Code 41688666043483

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2010–11)

The School Community
Ralston Middle School, located in the City of Belmont on the peninsula south of San Francisco, is the only middle school in the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District. Students in 8th grade are promoted to the Sequoia Union High School District. Most of the students from Ralston attend Carlmont High School, although some go on to private high schools or other high schools in the Sequoia High School district. The Ralston School community consists of families for whom education is a priority. The school is the hub of the community for many of these parents. Families enthusiastically support the Parent Teacher Association, School Site Council, School Force and countless volunteer activities and projects.

Ralston Middle School provides a highly academic and nurturing environment where all students, parents and staff pursue academic excellence and participate fully in the life of the school. The Ralston School Mission Statement, developed by staff, parents and student representatives to our School Site Council, serves as a framework for our school’s goals and priorities. This spirit of partnership pervades all that we do at Ralston.

Ralston’s primary mission is to provide a challenging instructional program that focuses on the diverse needs of middle school students. Together, as a staff and community, we have the capacity to present academic programs that are rich and compelling, supported by the structure of California State Content Standards, and the resources necessary to create student-centered classrooms. Students are engaged in a highly creative elective program that provides enrichment opportunities for all levels of learners. In addition, Ralston students score in the 90th percentile for fitness, far surpassing the average score in California. Ralston School is characterized by:

  • A safe, orderly, attractive campus
  • A rigorous academic core curriculum
  • A rich elective program
  • A strong student support system
  • A wide range of extracurricular activities
  • A firm commitment to technology in the classroom
  • A dedicated and competent professional staff
  • A supportive and involved parent community
  • An energetic, enthusiastic, and highly capable student body
  • A deep commitment to community service

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2010–11)

  • After School Clubs
  • Assemblies
  • Classroom field trips
  • 8th grade graduation party
  • Hot Lunch Program
  • Magazine Drive
  • Monetary gifts
  • Multicultural Fair
  • Music Boosters
  • Parent Education
  • Program Development
  • Safety Committee
  • School Dances
  • School Force
  • Spring Fling
  • Technology assistance


Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2010–11)

Grade Level Number of Students Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten 0 Grade 8 285
Grade 1 0 Ungraded Elementary 0
Grade 2 0 Grade 9 0
Grade 3 0 Grade 10 0
Grade 4 0 Grade 11 0
Grade 5 0 Grade 12 0
Grade 6 331 Ungraded Secondary 0
Grade 7 289 Total Enrollment 905

Student Enrollment by Subgroup (School Year 2010–11)

Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American 2.8%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2%
Asian 24.8%
Filipino 4.3%
Hispanic or Latino 9.6%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.7%
White 57.1%
Two or More Races 0.6%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 1.5%
English Learners 8.6%
Students with Disabilities 0.0%

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)

Subject Avg. Class Size 2008–09 Number of Classes* Avg. Class Size 2009–10 Number of Classes* Avg. Class Size 2010–11 Number of Classes*
1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+
English
24.6
6
28
2
23.8
11
22
2
23
11
27
1
Mathematics
26.1
4
28
1
25.2
9
23
1
25.5
5
29
1
Science
26.2
1
30
25.2
6
27
26.3
6
28
Social Science
26.7
1
30
25.2
6
27
26.3
4
30
* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

III. School Climate

School Safety Plan (School Year 2010–11)

In order to provide students with a safe school that maintains a positive climate for learning, Ralston Middle School staff has a multifaceted approach to safety. The Board of Trustees Board Policy requires the school to maintain an updated Disaster Preparedness plan, which covers emergencies such as earthquakes, fire, bomb threats, or other disturbances. The plan includes emergency phone numbers, roles for staff members, and procedures to ensure student safety. Ralston staff members participate in the Belmont Safe Schools program and (School Safety Committee), attend meetings and take part in simulations to develop and to keep our safety plans current. A School Resource Officer from the Belmont Police Department works with the school's administration to maintain a safe and secure campus. Emergency Response lists and Emergency phone trees are updated yearly.

Students are advised of the policies regarding Sexual Harassment, bullying and cyber bullying. Staff members regularly address issues of concern about school safety and are proactive in addressing all types of bullying. Every year the PTA supports programs and assemblies to support positive school climate and safety.

Suspensions and Expulsions

Rate* School 2008–09 School 2009–10 School 2010–11 District 2008–09 District 2009–10 District 2010–11
Suspensions 23.08% 10.87% 11.93% 7.28% 3.27% 3.81%
Expulsions 0.12% 0.34% 0.11% 0.04% 0.09% 0.03%
* The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment.

IV. School Facilities

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (School Year 2011–12)

Age of Buildings:
This school has 46 classrooms, 2 music rooms, a library, a multipurpose room, a gymnasium, girls’ and boys’ locker rooms, and administrative offices. The main buildings were constructed in 1954, and modernized in 2003. Four portable classrooms were installed on the campus in 2000. Cleaning Standards: The District has adopted cleaning standards for each school, and a copy of these is available in the principal’s office. The principal works daily with the custodial staff to develop and implement cleaning practices that ensure a clean and safe school campus.

Maintenance and Repair:
District maintenance staff, assisted as necessary by outside contractors, keeps the school in good repair. Work orders are completed in a timely manner, and tracked on a computerized system of record keeping, which also allows priority to be assigned to emergency repairs.


Complaints and Reports of Conditions Requiring Remedy:
Each classroom contains a notice regarding the availability of complaint or report of unsafe condition forms, which can be found in the principal’s office. The District uses the Uniform Complaint Process (per Board Policy) in responding to all filed complaints.

Of the 46 classrooms at Ralston during the 2010-2011 school year, 34 classrooms were used for regular instruction. Specialized classrooms are available for science, computer labs, animation, industrial technology, culinary arts, and music. In addition, there are two Science buildings that house labs for 6 th, 7th and 8th grades, and a large school gymnasium. Every classroom has at least one computer connected to the Internet. The library is equipped with 35 computers with Internet access for student and teacher use. Three classrooms are equipped as multimedia classrooms. The PTA has purchased interactive SMARTBoards, LCD projectors, and teacher laptops for almost every classroom.  There are two full time computer labs with over 25 computers in each room.

During the summer of 2008, the music buildings were completely renovated with HVAC and acoustical enhancements. The Multi purpose room was equipped with a new ADA compliant elevator chair lift. All lunch tables were replaced with new safe pullout tables in the Multi purpose room. The interior of the hallways were painted, and approximately 10 classrooms received new carpeting, The electrical cage in the courtyard was completely replaced in the summer of 2008.

School Facility Good Repair Status (School Year 2011–12)

System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned
Exemplary Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
X
 
Interior: Interior Surfaces
X
 
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
X
 
Electrical: Electrical
X
 
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
X
 
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
X
 
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
X

Needs repair in the near future

External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
X
 
Overall Rating  
X
Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.

V. Teachers

Teacher Credentials

Teachers School 2008–09 School 2009–10 School 2010–11 District 2010–11
With Full Credential
38
41
41
148
Without Full Credential
0
0
0
1
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential)
6
6
0
0


Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicator 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 
0
0
0
Total Teacher Misassignments*
0
0
0
Vacant Teacher Positions
0
0
0
Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.

* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2010–11)

The Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), requires that core academic subjects be taught by Highly Qualified Teachers, defined as having at least a bachelor’s degree, an appropriate California teaching credential, and demonstrated core academic subject area competence. For more information, see the CDE Improving Teacher and Principal Quality Web page at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School  100% 0%
All Schools in District 99% 1%
High-Poverty Schools in District N/A N/A
Low-Poverty Schools in District 99% 1%
Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 25 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

VI. Support Staff

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2010–11)

Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor 1.0 905
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0.0
Library Media Teacher (librarian) 0.75
Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) 0.0
Psychologist 0.5
Social Worker 0.0
Nurse 1.0 District
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.0
Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.0
Other 0.0
Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.
* One Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full-time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full-time.

VII. Curriculum and Instructional Materials

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2011–12)

This section describes whether the textbooks and instructional materials used at the school are from the most recent adoption; whether there are sufficient textbooks and instruction materials for each student; and information about the school’s use of any supplemental curriculum or non-adopted textbooks or instructional materials.
Year and month in which data were collected: __November 2011___
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and instructional materials/year of adoption From most recent adoption? Percent students lacking own assigned copy
Reading/Language Arts

Prentice Hall:
Literature, California Edition
McDougal Littell:
The Language of Literature

/ 2002-2003

 No 0%
Mathematics

HOLT California:
Course 1: Numbers to Algebra
HOLT California:
Course 2: Pre-Algebra
HOLT California:
Algebra 1
McDougal Littell/Houghton Mifflin: Geometry for Enjoyment and Challenge

/ 2008-2009

 Yes 0%
Science

Holt, Rinehart and Winston:
Holt California Science Earth, Life and Physical Science
for Grades 6th through 8th

/ 2007-2008

 Yes 0%
History-Social Science

6: McDougal Littell: McDougal Littell California Middle School Social Studies Series
7: Teacher's Curriculum Institute: History Alive! California Middle School Program.
8: Glenco/McGraw-Hill: Glencoe Discovering Our Past

/ 2007-2008

 Yes 0%
Foreign Language N/A N/A N/A
Health

Health curriculum is incorporated into 7th grade Science

N/A N/A
Visual and Performing Arts N/A N/A N/A
Science Laboratory Equipment (grades 9-12) N/A N/A N/A


VIII. School Finances

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2009–10)

Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental / Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic / Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary
School Site
$6,027
$989
$5,038
$87,650
District
$6,801
$83,710
Percent Difference – School Site and District

-26% (less)

74% of District

4.71% (more)

104.71% of District

State
$5,455
$65,524
Percent Difference – School Site and State

-8% (less)

92% of State

34% (more)

134% of State

Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.

Supplemental/Restricted expenditures come from money whose use is controlled by law or by a donor. Money that is designated for specific purposes by the district or governing board is not considered restricted. Basic/unrestricted expenditures are from money whose use, except for general guidelines, is not controlled by law or by a donor.

For detailed information on school expenditures for all districts in California, see the CDE Current Expense of Education & Per-pupil Spending Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/. For information on teacher salaries for all districts in California, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. To look up expenditures and salaries for a specific school district, see the Ed-Data Web site at: http://www.ed-data.org.

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2010–11)

  • Regular Education
  • After School Sports
  • Class Size Reduction
  • Guidance Counselor
  • Homework Centers
  • Local Grants
  • Music
  • Outdoor Education
  • Science & Reading Specialists
  • Summer School
    (Special Ed only)
  • School Force
Special Programs
  • Art Programs
  • Home to School Transportation
    (Special Ed. only)
  • County Sp Ed
  • Psychologists
  • Speech
  • SP Ed IDEA
  • RSP, SDC, NPS & Learning Centers
  • Teachers
  • Classified Staff
  • Benefits
  • Books & Supplies
  • Drug Free/Title IV
  • Equipment
  • Routine Repairs and Maintenance
  • Teacher Quality
  • Title I
  • Title II
  • Title III
  • Title III not LEA
  • Title V
  • Supplemental Counseling
  • Peer Assistance & Review (PAR)
  • Math & Reading
  • Math & Reading EL
  • School Safety Violence Prevention
  • Admin Training Program
  • National Board Certified Teachers
  • BTSA
  • Staff Professional Development
  • Arts Block Grant and Music Block Grant
  • Library Services
  • Economic Impact Aid (EIA)
  • English Language Acquisition Program (ELAP)
  • Ed. Technology
  • Gifted And Talented Education (GATE)
  • Instructional Materials for Realignment Program (IMFRP)
  • Lottery Prop 20
  • Oracle Grant
  • School Improvement Library Program (SLIP)
  • Tobacco Use Preventions Education (TUPE)
  • Tolerance Ed
  • Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant (TIIG)


Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2009–10)

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $46,668 $41,183
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $68,795 $63,647
Highest Teacher Salary $88,854 $80,955
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $121,644 $102,400
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $127,566 $106,158
Average Principal Salary (High) N/A $124,133
Superintendent Salary $169,596 $151,742
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 43.00% 41.00%
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 8.00% 6.00%
Note: For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.

IX. Student Performance

Standardized Testing and Reporting Program

The Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program consists of several key components, including: The assessments under the STAR Program show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. On each of these assessments, student scores are reported as performance levels.

For detailed information regarding the STAR Program results for each grade and performance level, including the percent of students not tested, see the CDE STAR Results Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov.

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students – Three-Year Comparison

Subject Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11
English-Language Arts 80% 80% 82% 79% 80% 81% 50% 52% 54%
Mathematics 71% 74% 73% 77% 80% 79% 46% 48% 50%
Science 81% 84% 88% 82% 86% 88% 50% 53% 56%
History-Social Science 64% 70% 77% 64% 70% 77% 41% 44% 48%
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results by Student Group – Most Recent Year
*Subgroup data is being recalculated and results will be available March 2012.

Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
English- Language Arts Mathematics Science History- Social Science
All Students in the LEA 81% 79% 88% 77%
All Students at the School 82% 73% 88% 77%
Male 78% 70% 89% 78%
Female 87% 77% 87% 76%
Black or African American 68% 52% 0% 0%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0% 0% 0% 0%
Asian 91% 92% 95% 88%
Filipino 78% 65% 0% 82%
Hispanic or Latino 58% 41% 71% 43%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0% 0% 0% 0%
White 84% 73% 89% 79%
Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52% 42% 85% 50%
English Learners* -- -- -- --
Students with Disabilities 61% 51% 82% 57%
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

 

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2010–11)

The California Physical Fitness Test (PFT) is administered to students in grades five, seven, and nine only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting the fitness standards for the most recent testing period. For detailed information regarding this test, and comparisons of a school’s test results to the district and state, see the CDE PFT Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/.
Grade Level Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
7
8.5%
20.8%
65.7%
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

X. Accountability

Academic Performance Index

The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of state academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. For detailed information about the API, see the CDE API Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.

Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison

This table displays the school’s statewide and similar schools’ API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest ten percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest ten percent of all schools in the state.

The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched “similar schools.” A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school’s academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing ten schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school’s academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
API Rank 2008 2009 2010
Statewide 9 10 10
Similar Schools 4 8 7

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison
*Subgroup data is being recalculated and results will be available March 2012.

Group Actual API Change 2008–09 Actual API Change 2009–10 Actual API Change 2010–11
All Students at the School 35 4 7
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian 25 2 9
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 38 0 4
Two or More Races N/D
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
English Learners* --
Students with Disabilities 92 35 -17
Note: “N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – 2011 Growth API Comparison

This table displays, by student group, the number of students included in the API and the 2011 Growth API at the school, LEA, and state level.
*Subgroup data is being recalculated and results will be available March 2012.
Group 2011 Growth API
Number of Students School Number of Students LEA Number of Students State
All Students at the School 904 900 2,311 907 4,683,676 778
Black or African American 25 809 55 801 317,856 696
American Indian or Alaska Native 2 3 33,774 733
Asian 225 961 542 962 398,869 898
Filipino 38 863 86 882 123,245 859
Hispanic or Latino 85 775 231 805 2,406,749 729
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 6 27 829 26,953 764
White 515 904 1,303 909 1,258,831 845
Two or More Races 6 58 941 76,766 836
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52 761 134 764 2,731,843 726
English Learners* -- -- 658 1,521,844 707
Students with Disabilities 130 740 325 772 521,815 595

Adequate Yearly Progress

The federal ESEA requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria: For detailed information about AYP, including participation rates and percent proficient results by student group, see the CDE AYP Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2010–11)

AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall No No
Met Participation Rate - English-Language Arts Yes Yes
Met Participation Rate - Mathematics Yes Yes
Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts No No
Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics No No
Met API Criteria Yes Yes
Met Graduation Rate N/A N/A

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2011–12)

Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (ELA or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. For detailed information about PI identification, see the CDE PI Status Determinations Web page: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/tidetermine.asp.
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status N/A Not In PI
First Year of Program Improvement N/A N/A
Year in Program Improvement N/A N/A
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 0
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 0.0%
Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.

XI. School Completion and Postsecondary Preparation

N/A Ralston is an intermediate school.

XII. Instructional Planning and Scheduling

Professional Development

This section provides information on the annual number of school days dedicated to staff development for the most recent three-year period.

2008-2009: 1 day dedicated to staff development
2009-2010: 1 day dedicated to staff development
2010-2011: 1 day dedicated to staff development

Staff development activities are determined through a process which begins with the staff identifying needs that are related to the goals identified in the School Improvement Plan. Ralston’s teachers
participate in one day of staff development during the school year. During minimum days on Wednesdays, teachers received training and professional development in:

  • Mathematics
  • Grade Level Collaboration
  • School safety
  • Curriculum and Instructional Practices
  • Integrating Technology
  • Review of state testing data

 Individual staff members participate in additional conferences, workshops and training in specific areas identified in the Single Plan for Student Achievement. Professional development also includes peer
coaching, particularly when teachers have specific expertise. Our district uses a teacher evaluation program designed by teachers, which incorporates the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP). Teachers use the CSTP to both self-assess their areas of strength and of growth and to collaborate with their colleagues in setting goals. The principal uses CSTP during observations and in the
summative evaluation.

 
Ralston Intermediate   School Accountability Report Card, 2010-2011
Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary   Provided by the Ed-Data Partnership
Prepared by PowerTurn, Inc.   For more information visit www.ed-data.org