School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2004-2005 Published During 2005-2006 |
| Notes regarding the source and currency of data: Data included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) template are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/definitions05.asp Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2004-05 school year or from the two preceding years (2002-03 and 2003-04). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2003-04. Single-year column headings refer to the school year ending in that particular year. When no year is specified, data are from the most recent school year for which data are available. More information about SARC requirements is available at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/, including a SARC Preparation Guide at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/guide.asp and Frequently Asked Questions at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/questions.asp. |
I. General Information
Contact Information
Information about school and district contacts.
| School Information |
District Information |
||
| School Name |
Central Elementary |
District Name |
Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary |
| Principal |
Cori McKenzie |
Superintendent |
John McIntosh |
| Street |
525 Middle Road |
Street |
2960 Hallmark Dr. |
| City, State, Zip |
Belmont, CA 94002-2130 |
City, State, Zip |
Belmont, CA 94002-2943 |
| Phone Number |
650-637-4820 |
Phone Number |
650-637-4800 |
| FAX Number |
650-637-4827 |
FAX Number |
650-637-4811 |
| Web Site |
Web Site |
||
| Email Address |
Email Address |
||
| CDS Code |
41-68866-6043434 |
SARC Contact |
|
School
Description and Mission Statement
Information about the school, its programs, and its goals
| Central School, located in the City of Belmont on the peninsula south of San Francisco, is one of five elementary schools in the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District. Students are promoted to the 6th grade at Ralston Middle School, the only middle school in the District. The Central School community consists of families for whom education is a high priority. The school is the hub of the community for many families. Parents enthusiastically support the Parent Teacher Association, School Site Council and countless volunteer activities and projects. Pride in Central's many awards and honors, including the 2004 Presidential Environmental Youth Award, is apparent in all members of the school community.
The mission of Central School is to provide our students with a high quality educational environment in which students, staff, and parents emphasize excellence: This mission was acknowledged as successful by the State of California when, in 1995, they recognized Central School as a " California Distinguished School". Staff, parents, and students are a community of learners who share this vision. Our vision is the unifying factor in setting each year's educational priorities. The principal facilitates the staff and SSC (School Site Council) to collaboratively plan the curriculum to reflect the school's goals. Throughout the school year student performance is measured against the vision, which is consistent with core curriculum standards. Student learning outcomes are the primary factors used to measure progress. These goals are carried out by Central’s staff, who is committed to substantive progress and continuous improvement. |
| Contact Person Name |
Deanna Bartee |
Contact Person Phone Number |
(650) 592-2292 |
|
|
||
| Grade Level | Enrollment | Grade Level | Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 53 | Grade 9 | 0 |
| Grade 1 | 48 | Grade 10 | 0 |
| Grade 2 | 38 | Grade 11 | 0 |
| Grade 3 | 61 | Grade 12 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 37 | Ungraded Secondary | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 47 | ||
| Grade 6 | 0 | ||
| Grade 7 | 0 | ||
| Grade 8 | 0 | ||
| Ungraded Elementary | 0 | Total Enrollment | 284 |
| Racial and Ethnic Subgroup | Number of Students | Percent of Students | Racial and Ethnic Subgroup | Number of Students | Percent of Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| African American | 8 | 2.8 | Hispanic or Latino | 24 | 8.5 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0.0 | Pacific Islander | 3 | 1.1 |
| Asian | 51 | 18.0 | White (Not Hispanic) | 190 | 66.9 |
| Filipino | 3 | 1.1 | Multiple or No Response | 5 | 1.8 |
III. School Safety and Climate for Learning
School Safety Plan
Information about the currency and contents of the school's comprehensive safety plan.
| Date of Last Review/Update |
4/05 |
Date Last Discussed with Staff |
5/05 |
| Emergency Procedures These emergency safety procedures are available on the web site. It is recommended that you give a copy of these procedures to those you have designated as emergency contacts on your child's emergency card. Disaster Preparedness In case of a disaster, all children will either "duck and cover" and then evacuate the building, or evacuate immediately, depending on the crisis. Each teacher will stay with his/her class until all parents or designees pick up the children. If safe, we will return to the building to wait inside, otherwise we will remain outside.
For your information, we have a complete Emergency Response Plan available in our office. You are welcome to come in and review it at anytime. Central School 's parent / staff Emergency Committee continually work toward improving student safety. In the past few years a "Kid's Preparedness Kit" concept was developed as a way for parents to participate in preparing our students in the event of a natural disaster or emergency during school hours. All students bring a completed Emergency Release card, along with specific snacks, which are stored by class in the emergency shed. The goal is to provide comfort and sustenance for students in time of an emergency. At the end of each year, the school enjoys the snacks at a Disaster-Free picnic. The committee has also inventoried all items needed in case of an emergency and purchased those items lacking. An Emergency Preparedness flip chart for each classroom was developed for teachers to refer to in case of an emergency. Each classroom also has a First Aid kit, which is used by the teacher in case of an emergency. The committee has recently reviewed and edited Central's Disaster Preparedness Plan. The Emergency committee is an integral part of Central's ongoing efforts towards excellence in student safety and preparedness. |
|||
School Programs and Practices That Promote a Positive Learning Environment
Information
about the school's efforts to create and maintain a positive learning
environment, including the use of disciplinary strategies.
Students at Central are positive, enthusiastic learners. The desire and love of learning are hallmarks for the children who attend school here. Parent and community volunteers help us to be assured that no child has an unanswered question or need. The school promotes a “Culture of Courtesy” by establishing an environment that encourages courtesy, respect and responsibility. The Magic Words, (i.e. please, thank you, may I, excuse me, you’re welcome) are posted throughout the school. Each week one of the magic words is emphasized. It is introduced at Monday Morning Meeting, a meeting of the student body at the beginning of each week. In addition to introducing the Word for the Week students are honored for acts of responsibility and kindness at Monday Morning Meeting, as well as acknowledged for their birthdays and special accomplishments. Objectives and activities are planned in grade level meetings by the faculty, who work well together to assure the success of all students. The collegiality and the richness gained from shared thought and planning are important factors enriching the learning environment. Classroom teachers work with a variety of specialists such as Reading , Music, and Science teachers to expand the work of classroom teachers in benefiting every student. A variety of programs are available to children with special needs such as RSP, School Psychologist, Speech and Language, GATE, and ELL. These programs assure us that all children achieve at their highest levels. Technology became an important part of the school since our work with Challenge 2000 grant. Project based learning through multimedia presentations enhance learning activities for children. The use of computers in both the lab and classroom enable students to word process, draw, and seek information. |
School Facility Conditions -- General Information
Information
about the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities,
including the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds,
buildings, and restrooms. Additional information about the condition of
the school's facilities may be obtained by speaking with the school
principal.
| Age of Buildings: This school has 18 classrooms, a music room, a library, a multipurpose room, and administrative offices (in 2004-2005). The main buildings were constructed in 1964, and modernized in 2004. Two portable classrooms were installed on the campus in 1998. Cleaning Standards:The District has adopted cleaning standards for each school, and a copy of these is available in the principal’s office. The principal works daily with the custodial staff to develop and implement cleaning practices that ensure a clean and safe school campus. Maintenance and Repair:District maintenance staff, assisted as necessary by outside contractors, keep the school in good repair. Work orders are completed in a timely manner, and tracked on a computerized system of record keeping, which also allows priority to be assigned to emergency repairs. Complaints and Reports of Conditions Requiring Remedy:Each classroom contains a notice regarding the availability of complaint or report of unsafe condition forms, which can be found in the principal’s office. The District uses the Uniform Complaint Process (per Board Policy) in responding to all filed complaints. Of the 18 classrooms at Central, 14 are used for regular instruction. The other classrooms are used for a 4/5 Science lab, the Reading Specialist classroom, and space for individualized tutoring and instruction. The Computer Lab has 22 computers networked to two printers, a Smart Board and a projector. An additional projector is available for use in classrooms. The library has 2 card catalogue computers and 2 librarian computers. There are teacher computer stations with printers in every room. The classroom computers are connected to TV monitors so that lessons can be projected from the computer to TV screen. Classrooms also have between 2 and 5 computers in them, in addition to the teacher’s computer, all of which are connected to the Internet. Every staff member has received mandated technology training. All classrooms have telephones. Each staff member has email and voice mailbox. During 2004, four restroom facilities at Central have been completely renovated. We have also installed ADA (American Disabilities Act) equipment and accommodations to become completely handicap compliant. Portables have been made available for childcare services provided by a private agency. Before and after school care provides supervision for students in K-5 five days per week as well as all day on district in-service days and some holidays. |
School Facility Conditions -- Results of Inspection and Evaluation
Data reported are the determination of good repair as documented in a completed Interim Evaluation Instrument, including the school site inspection date, the Interim Evaluation Instrument completion date, and the date of any remedial action taken or planned.
Additional information about the condition of the school's facilities
may be obtained by speaking with the school principal.
| Interim Evaluation Instrument Part |
Facility in Good Repair |
Deficiency and Remedial Actions Taken or Planned |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| Gas Leaks | X |
||
| Mechanical Systems | X |
||
| Windows/Doors/Gates (interior and exterior) | X |
New hardware that is ADA approved has been installed on all doors |
|
| Interior Surfaces (walls, floors, and ceilings) | X |
||
| Hazardous Materials (interior and exterior) | X |
||
| Structural Damage | X |
||
| Fire Safety | X |
New, modernized fire and bell system has been installed |
|
| Electrical (interior and exterior) | X |
Electrical system upgraded to accommodate new improvements |
|
| Pest/Vermin Infestation | X |
||
| Drinking Fountains (inside and outside) | X |
Two new drinking fountains installed; all water fountains upgraded to ADA approval |
|
| Restrooms | X |
Four restrooms completely renovated; the remaining two upgraded to ADA approval |
|
| Sewer | X |
||
| Playground/School Grounds | X |
In 2004 Central completed a new, environmentally friendly playground made from recycled materials and installed it through a community build |
|
| Other | |||
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| English-Language Arts | 66 | 67 | 74 | 58 | 57 | 65 | 35 | 36 | 40 |
| Mathematics | 65 | 71 | 80 | 59 | 60 | 66 | 35 | 34 | 38 |
| Science | 69 | 55 | 0 | 49 | 49 | 27 | 25 | 27 | |
| History-Social Science | 47 | 49 | 48 | 28 | 29 | 32 | |||
| Subject | African American | American Indian or Alaska Native | Asian | Filipino | Hispanic or Latino | Pacific Islander | White (not Hispanic) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English-Language Arts | * | 76 | * | 38 | * | 78 | |
| Mathematics | * | 88 | * | 54 | * | 81 | |
| Science | * | * | * | 53 | |||
| History-Social Science |
| Subject | Male | Female | English Learners | Economically Disadvantaged | Students With Disabilities | Migrant Education |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English-Language Arts | 73 | 75 | * | * | 55 | |
| Mathematics | 81 | 80 | * | * | 59 | |
| Science | 68 | 46 | * | * | ||
| History-Social Science |
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| Reading | 68 | 69 | 69 | 65 | 65 | 67 | 43 | 43 | 41 |
| Mathematics | 79 | 81 | 89 | 71 | 73 | 74 | 50 | 51 | 52 |
| Subject | African American | American Indian or Alaska Native | Asian | Filipino | Hispanic or Latino | Pacific Islander | White (not Hispanic) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reading | 77 | * | * | 71 | |||
| Mathematics | 92 | * | * | 90 |
| Subject | Male | Female | English Learners | Economically Disadvantaged | Students With Disabilities | Migrant Education |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reading | 59 | 77 | * | * | * | |
| Mathematics | 93 | 86 | * | * | * |
| The District is currently developing a new local assessment system. At this time, the CST and NRT data (see above) is used for program design and instructional purposes. |
| Grade Level | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Female | Male | Total | Female | Male | Total | Female | Male | |
| 5 | 28.2 | 40.9 | 11.8 | 25.0 | 26.4 | 23.6 | 24.5 | 26.7 | 22.3 |
| 7 | 56.6 | 68.2 | 48.4 | 28.8 | 30.9 | 26.8 | |||
| 9 | 26.7 | 25.8 | 27.5 | ||||||
| API Base Data | API Growth Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | From 2002 to 2003 | From 2003 to 2004 | From 2004 to 2005 | ||
| Percent Tested | 100 | 100 | 100 | Percent Tested | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| API Base Score | 841 | 854 | 866 | API Growth Score | 854 | 872 | 901 |
| Growth Target | A | A | A | Actual Growth | 13 | 18 | 35 |
| Statewide Rank | 9 | 9 | 10 | ||||
| Similar Schools Rank | 3 | 9 | 3 | ||||
| API Base Data | API Growth Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | From 2002 to 2003 | From 2003 to 2004 | From 2004 to 2005 | ||
| African American | African American | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | American Indian or Alaska Native | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| Asian | Asian | ||||||
| API Base Score | 895 | 904 | API Growth Score | 895 | 885 | ||
| Growth Target | A | A | Actual Growth | 0 | -19 | ||
| Filipino | Filipino | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| Hispanic or Latino | Hispanic or Latino | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| Pacific Islander | Pacific Islander | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| White (Not Hispanic) | White (Not Hispanic) | ||||||
| API Base Score | 837 | 853 | 881 | API Growth Score | 853 | 885 | 904 |
| Growth Target | A | A | A | Actual Growth | 16 | 32 | 23 |
| API Base Data | API Growth Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | From 2002 to 2003 | From 2003 to 2004 | From 2004 to 2005 | ||
| API Base Score | 895 | API Growth Score | 892 | ||||
| Growth Target | A | Actual Growth | |||||
| Although state intervention and awards programs are currently in the California Education Code, the programs were not funded for the period addressed by this report. Therefore, there are currently no data available to report. |
| Schoolwide | School | District | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| All Students | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Schoolwide and Subgroups | School | District | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| All Students | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| African American | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Asian | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Filipino | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Hispanic or Latino | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pacific Islander | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| White (not Hispanic) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | Yes | N/A | N/A | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| English Learners | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Students with Disabilities | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| School | District | |
|---|---|---|
| First Year of Program Improvement Implementation | ||
| Year in Program Improvement (Implementation Level) | ||
| Year Exited Program Improvement | ||
| Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 0 |
| Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 0.0 |
VI. School Completion (Secondary Schools)
Central is an Elementary school. No data are available for this section
VII. Class Size
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution
Data
reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that
fall into each size category (i.e., number of students), by grade
level, as reported by CBEDS.
| Grade | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | |||||||
| 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | ||||
| K | 18.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 3 | 17.7 | 3 | ||||||
| 1 | 19.0 | 3 | 19.0 | 1 | 18.7 | 3 | ||||||
| 2 | 20.0 | 2 | 19.7 | 3 | 19.0 | 1 | ||||||
| 3 | 15.7 | 3 | 18.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 2 | ||||||
| 4 | 16.5 | 1 | 1 | 23.5 | 2 | 26.0 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 27.0 | 3 | 28.0 | 2 | 21.0 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||
| K-3 | 19.0 | 1 | 19.5 | 2 | 19.0 | 2 | ||||||
| 3-4 | 20.0 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 4-8 | ||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||
Class Size Reduction Participation
Data reported are the percent of students in each grade level in the school that are in a class size reduction classroom.
| Grade Level | Percent of Students Participating | ||
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| K | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
VIII. Teacher and Staff Information
Core Academic Courses Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
For
a school, the data reported are the percent of a school's classes in
core academic subjects taught by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) compliant
teachers. For a district, the data reported are the percent of all
classes in core academic subjects taught by NCLB compliant teachers in
all schools in the district, in high-poverty schools in the district,
and in low-poverty schools in the district. More information on teacher
qualifications required under NCLB can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.
| Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers | |
|---|---|
| This School | 100.0 |
| All Schools in District | 88.8 |
| High-Poverty Schools in District | 0.0 |
| Low-Poverty Schools in District | 88.8 |
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Teachers | 20 | 16 | 16 |
| Teachers with Full Credential | 19 | 16 | 15 |
| Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area (full credential teaching outside subject area) |
0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teachers in Alternative Routes to Certification (district and university internship) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Pre-Internship | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teachers with Emergency Permits (not qualified for a credential or internship but meeting minimum requirements) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Teachers with Waivers (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners |
0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Teacher Misassignments |
0 | 0 | 0 |
| School | District | |
|---|---|---|
| Doctorate | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Master's Degree plus 30 or more semester hours | 0.0 | 5.9 |
| Master's Degree | 25.0 | 20.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree plus 30 or more semester hours | 75.0 | 72.6 |
| Bachelor's Degree | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Less than Bachelor's Degree | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vacant Teacher Positions |
0 | 0 | 0 |
Teacher Evaluations
Information about the procedures and criteria for teacher evaluations.
| Formal evaluations are done at least once each year for new probationary staff and every other year for permanent staff. Formal evaluations include an initial conference with the administrator, observations of the teacher in the classroom, and a final evaluation conference. Progress towards meeting California Standards for the Teaching Profession is monitored by both the teacher and the principal. This year Central is piloting a new teacher evaluation instrument aligned with the California Standards. |
Substitute Teachers
Information
about the availability of qualified substitute teachers and the impact
of any difficulties in this area on the instructional program at the
school.
| All substitutes used by Central School have passed a qualifying examination administered by the State of California . When a teacher is absent from class, a qualified substitute teacher teaches the class. If a substitute is not available, the class is taught by a credentialed district administrator or a teacher without a regular class assignment. Last year, teachers averaged about 1.7 days of absence per month. This included illness, in-service training, and other leaves. |
Counselors and Other Support Staff
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equal one FTE.
| Title |
FTE |
| Librarian (Media Tech.) |
.625 |
| Psychologist |
.4 |
| Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist |
.75 |
| Resource Specialist (non-teaching) |
1.0 |
| Inclusion aide and Paraprofessionals |
6 |
| We’ve designed Central’s core curriculum to be inclusive, sequential and aligned with District/State standards – all while challenging our students to think critically. We provide standards-based curriculum and materials to all students in all subject areas. We are pleased to watch our curriculum be validated by ongoing students’ progress as evidenced in the improvement each year in STAR testing scores. Central’s teachers and support staff work together to provide a rigorous and engaging program aligned to California State Standards, particularly in the school’s two areas of curricular focus: math and ELA. We adopted our new math program in 2002, after intensive research by the district-wide curriculum committee, consisting of teachers, parents and administrators. We selected Everyday Mathematics, a research-based, spiraling balanced program because of its rigor and focus on critical thinking skills. In 2003 the District used the same process to adopt a new ELA program, Houghton Mifflin: Reading. This program aligns with state standards and integrates history/social science and science for each grade level. This year, our staff targeted writing as a school focus, thanks to STAR data and local assessments. We searched for a model school with an exemplary writing program and found one in Danville, CA. Based on their great success record with the new ELA adoption, we sent a team of our principal, staff and SSC to visit the school. We witnessed firsthand that improving student writing has the greatest impact on all areas of ELA. Soon after this visit, Central and our district decided to use 6 Traits Writing as a springboard to better writing. In science, Central has implemented the district-adopted Full Option Science Systems (FOSS) method. Our teachers use the hands-on, inquiry based method of teaching science encouraging students to learn through experimentation. Houghton Mifflin Discovery Works textbooks supplement our science curriculum. Central’s PE program is designed to make fitness fun in noncompetitive ways. In 2003, teachers focused on improving PE by adopting Sparks (Sports, Play and Active Recreation for Kids) for all grades. Sparks was added to Central’s award-winning Boot Camp, a twice weekly morning exercise program for grades 3-5 that prepares students for the 5th grade Presidential Physical Fitness test. PE combines with our community outreach through two programs with NDNU (Notre Dame de Namur University). Central’s 4th and 5th graders partner with NDNU Men’s Varsity Lacrosse Team for six weeks, learning the elements of lacrosse, as well as good sportsmanship with their terrific college role models. We began a parallel program in January with NDNU Women’s Varsity Volleyball Team! At Central, our fifth graders attend Outdoor Ed, a rigorous yet re-energizing mind-body week long camp experience of hiking and communing with nature. Outside of the normal classroom, all students participate in field trips, which extend core curriculum to real world experiences. Central also has after school classes in chess, Spanish and science to further bolster regular academic programs. Thanks to our school community belief in the arts, our PTA-sponsored Art in Action (AiA) has allowed students to blossom through art activities that support our vision of “educating the whole child.” AiA is a standards-based art program promoting and giving multi-cultural expressions of art taught by trained parent/docents to grades 2-5. Music for Minors (MFM) provides standards-aligned music enrichment in grades K-3. Third graders learn to play recorders and perform at a spring concert. Grades 4 and 5 also participate in band and chorus and perform at site assemblies. Instruction and Support for Special Needs "Pull-out" programs for students with specialized needs have been scheduled in order to provide an in-depth program for all students. Support for special needs of students begins with Student Study Teams who, meeting regularly, develop strategies to help students become more successful in school. The Student Study Team (SST) is a group of concerned experts working collaboratively with parents to support students who are showing initial signs of difficulties at school. Through SST, the student’s strengths and needs are identified by reviewing assessment data, work samples, attendance data, developmental and health history, and current intervention approaches. The entire team develops new interventions that may be as simple as a classroom accommodation, or as intensive as a referral to special education, but most importantly, are particular to that student’s needs. For example, SST might recommend that a student with social or emotional difficulties participate in a facilitated playgroup at lunchtime. All team members receive printed summaries of each meeting to serve as an action plan to ensure accountability. We schedule follow-up meetings to monitor student progress. Students identified as non-proficient, because they struggle with concepts and/or content, or perform one+ grade levels below standard on class work and testing, receive classroom modification strategies and/or other support services to help them succeed, including:
|
Professional Development
| Staff development activities are determined through a process, which begins with the staff identifying needs that are related to the goals identified in the School Improvement Plan. District-wide needs identified through the "Futures" planning process are also incorporated into the plans for staff development. The calendar and topics for staff development conducted on non-student days are identified in the School Improvement Plan each year. Central School 's teachers participate in two days of staff development before the students return to school. An additional staff development day was conducted during the school year. Central’s staff passionately believes the best professional development occurs when teachers have an opportunity to reflect and set goals for their teaching. Our district uses a teacher evaluation program designed by teachers, which incorporates the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP). Teachers use the CSTP to both self-assess their areas of strength and of growth and to collaborate with their colleagues in setting goals. The principal uses CSTP during observations and in the summative evaluation. Professional development also includes peer coaching, particularly when teachers have specific expertise. For example, two of our staff members are certified in Technology Education. Ongoing staff training in technology comes from these staff members, as well as outside sources. |
| Core Curriculum Areas | Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Instructional Materials |
|---|---|
| Reading/Language Arts | Houghton Mifflin: Reading 2002 – 2003 |
| Mathematics | McGraw Hill: Everyday Mathematics 2002 – 2003 |
| Science | Harcourt Brace, FOSS, Houghton Mifflin 2001 – 2002 |
| History-Social Science |
K-2 Harcourt Brace: Social Studies C2000 1999-2000
3-5 McGraw Hill: Adventures in Time and Place 1999-2000 Note: New standards based textbooks will be adopted in 2006 – 2007 |
| Core Curriculum Areas | Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials |
|---|---|
| Reading/Language Arts | One textbook per child |
| Mathematics | One textbook per child |
| Science | Instructional kits and shared class sets |
| History-Social Science | One textbook per child |
| Foreign Language | N/A |
| Health | N/A |
| Grade Level |
Instructional Minutes | |
| Offered | State Requirement | |
| K | 39,775 | 36,000 |
| 1 | 51,965 | 50,400 |
| 2 | 51,965 | 50,400 |
| 3 | 51,965 | 50,400 |
| 4 | 54,585 | 54,000 |
| 5 | 54,585 | 54,000 |
| The school held 49 minimum days including all Wednesdays, parent conferences conducted at the end of the Fall and Spring Progress Report periods, the last day of school and Back To School. These afternoons were devoted to grade level teaming and staff in-service. |
| Category | District Amount |
State Average For Districts In Same Category |
|---|---|---|
| Beginning Teacher Salary | $33,508 | $36,605 |
| Mid-Range Teacher Salary | $62,031 | $56,479 |
| Highest Teacher Salary | $80,120 | $69,452 |
| Average Principal Salary (Elementary) | $98,579 | $86,793 |
| Average Principal Salary (Middle) | $104,620 | $89,269 |
| Average Principal Salary (High) | ||
| Superintendent Salary | $127,200 | $122,177 |
| Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries | 41.0 | 42.3 |
| Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries | 7.4 | 5.9 |
| District | District | State Average For Districts In Same Category |
State Average All Districts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dollars Expended |
Dollars Expended Per Student (ADA) |
Dollars Expended Per Student (ADA) |
Dollars Expended Per Student (ADA) |
| $17,740,635 | $7,335 | $6,643 | $6,919 |
Special Education
|
|
|