School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2003-2004  

Published During 2004-2005

Notes regarding the source and currency of data:
Data included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/definitions04.asp. Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2003-04 school year or from the two preceding years (2001-02 and 2002-03). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2002-03.

School Information District Information
 School Name  Fox Elementary  District Name  Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary
 Principal  Chris Marchetti  Superintendent   John McIntosh
 Street  3100 St. James Road  Street  2960 Hallmark Dr.
 City, State, Zip  Belmont, CA    94002-2956  City, State, Zip  Belmont, CA    94002-2943
 Phone Number  650-637-4850  Phone Number  650-637-4800
 FAX Number  650-637-4858  FAX Number  650-637-4811
 Web Site  www.belmont.k12.ca.us/main/fox/  Web Site

  www.belmont.k12.ca.us

 E-mail Address  cmarch@belmont.k12.ca.us  E-mail Address

  jmcintosh@belmont.k12.ca.us

 CDS Code

 41-68866-6043459

 SARC Contact

 Jeannie Bosley <jbosley@belmont.k12.ca.us >

School Description and Mission Statement

Fox School , located in the City of Belmont on the peninsula south of San Francisco , is one of five elementary schools in the Belmont- Redwood Shores School District . Students are promoted to the 6th grade at Ralston Middle School , the only middle school in the District. The Fox School community consists of families for whom education is a priority. The school is the hub of the community for many of these parents. Families enthusiastically support the Parent Teacher Association, School Site Council and countless volunteer activities and projects. Pride in Fox’s distinguished school recognition was reflected from all members of the school community.

Mission and Goals

At Fox Elementary School , our goal is that all students graduate to become creative, civic-minded, independent-thinking citizens. Fox School staff and parents work together to promote student intellectual, social, and moral development by:

  • Setting high academic standards, including teaching the basic skills and their application;
  • Connecting disparate academic subjects through themes, projects, and other integrated teaching methods;
  • Developing an aesthetic education though strong instruction in the visual and performing arts;
  • Emphasizing healthy living through exercise and responsible choices;
  • Helping each child develop his/her sense of self through a variety of learning experiences;
  • Modeling a commitment to community through volunteering.
Fox School ’s academic programs and sense of community nurture Fox students and prepare them to face the joys and challenges of the future.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement

 Contact Person Name  Steve Gross  Contact Person Phone Number   650-591-5935
  • Classroom field trips
  • Music for Minors
  • Computer education
  • Classroom supplies
  • Healthy Living Week
  • 5th grade graduation party
  • Hot Lunch Program
  • Fox Trot
  • Horticulture
  • Tutoring
  • Library Volunteers
  • Child Safety
  • Foxtravaganza Show
  • Parent education
  • Non-A-Thon fund raiser
  • SCRIP fund raiser
  • Monetary gifts
  • Family Math

I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment, by Grade Level
Data reported are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).

 Grade Level  Enrollment  Grade Level  Enrollment
 Kindergarten 42   Grade 9
 Grade 1 45   Grade 10
 Grade 2 51   Grade 11
 Grade 3 44   Grade 12
 Grade 4 55   Ungraded Secondary
 Grade 5 56     
 Grade 6
 Grade 7
 Grade 8
 Ungraded Elementary  Total Enrollment 293 

Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
Data reported are the number and percent of students in each racial/ethnic category as reported by CBEDS.
 Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
of
Students
 Percent
of
Students
 Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
of
Students
 Percent
of
Students
 African-American 1.4   Hispanic or Latino 18  6.1 
 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0   Pacific Islander 0.7 
 Asian 54  18.4   White (Not Hispanic) 176  60.1 
 Filipino 1.7   Multiple or No Response 34  11.6 


II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School Safety Plan
 Date of Last Review/Update   10/1/03  Date Last Discussed with Staff   10/20/2003

Emergency Card

Parents are requested to complete an Emergency Card every year. This information is of vital importance to the school program since this information advises the school of who to contact in the event of an emergency. The card also includes who the student can be released to in case of a disaster. In addition the cards are used by the teachers and the office for attendance. It is the parent's responsibility to immediately notify the school of any changes in the data.

Safety

Safety of our students is a prime concern of parents and school personnel. Fox School is a member of the Safe Schools program which is directed by the Belmont Police Department. Fire and earthquake drills are conducted regularly throughout the school year.

If a major earthquake occurs and damage is extensive, come to school as soon as possible to pick up your child or send the person listed on the Emergency Card. Please refrain from calling school and tying up the school telephones.

If an earthquake occurs while the child is

  • walking to school ........... child continues to school
  • walking home ................ child continues home
  • in neighborhood ............. child returns home
  • waiting for bus ............ child returns home

Make certain you arrange with neighbors for an alternate home to which your child should go if you are unavailable.

Should an emergency occur, students will only be released to their parents or the adult designated on his/her Emergency Card.

Fox School PTA has provided each classroom with an Emergency Bag to help us cope with a disaster for the first 24 hours. Check with your child's classroom teacher to find out if their Emergency Bag contains all the necessary items.

School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

The school’s goal is excellence for all students in learning a rich, meaning- centered thinking curriculum. High expectations are fostered for each student, and the teachers at Fox School demonstrate a commitment to finding strategies and resources to realize those expectations. All students have access to a challenging and meaningful curriculum, as well as to other school activities that promote student’s intellectual, ethical, cultural, emotional, and physical growth. Staff and students recognize and respect each other’s achievements, personal accomplishments, and cultural diversity. Students and staff feel safe in an orderly environment that promotes pride and facilitates learning, and that also includes a high level of congeniality among students and staff. The school publishes our discipline code to clearly communicate the importance of an orderly learning environment.


Suspensions and Expulsions
Data reported are the number of suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.
   School  District
 2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004
 Number of Suspensions
3
0
58
61
34
 Rate of Suspensions
.62% 
.92%
0%
2.32%
2.4%
1.38%
 Number of Expulsions
0
0
6
1
 Rate of Expulsions
0% 
0%
0%
0%
.24%
.04%

School Facilities

Safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities, including any needed maintenance to ensure good repair. Description of the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds, buildings, and restrooms.

Age of Buildings: This school has 20 classrooms, a music room, a library, a multipurpose room, and administrative offices (in 2004-2005). The main buildings were constructed in 1964, and modernized in 2004.

Cleaning Standards: The District has adopted cleaning standards for each school, and a copy of these is available in the principal’s office. The principal works daily with the custodial staff to develop and implement cleaning practices that ensure a clean and safe school campus.

Maintenance and Repair: District maintenance staff, assisted as necessary by outside contractors, keep the school in good repair. Work orders are completed in a timely manner, and tracked on a computerized system of record keeping, which also allows priority to be assigned to emergency repairs.

Complaints and Reports of Conditions Requiring Remedy: Each classroom contains a notice regarding the availability of complaint or report of unsafe condition forms, which can be found in the principal’s office. The District uses the Uniform Complaint Process (per Board Policy) in responding to all filed complaints.


Of the 20 classrooms at Fox, 15 classrooms are used for regular instruction, 2 for county programs, one for science, one for reading and one room is available as extra space to be used as needed. An additional instructional space is used for the Resource Specialist Program.

Fox School has approximately 1 computer per each 8 students. These computers are set up in “mini-labs” or pods for students to use. Each teacher has their own computer and printer work station. The library at Fox is automated on-line. Students have access to 4 computers in the library during recesses and lunch time.

Modular buildings have been made available for child care services provided by a private agency. Before and after school care provides supervision for students in K-5 five days per week as well as all day on district in-service days and some holidays.

In September 1998 every teacher in the District received a computer for both instruction and classroom management. Every staff member received mandated technology training. Every staff member was provided a telephone number and voice mailbox.  

III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) and a norm-referenced test (NRT). The CST tests English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science in grades 5, 9, 10, and 11, and history-social science in grades 8, 10, and 11. The NRT tests reading, language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in grades 9-11.

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards), Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Students with significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the CST are tested using the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Detailed information regarding CST and CAPA results for each grade and proficiency level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).

 Subject  School  District  State
 2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004
 English-Language Arts  60  59  62  57  58  57  32  35  36
 Mathematics  71  72  68  53  59  60  31  35  34
 Science      57    0  49  30  27  25
 History-Social Science          47  49  28  28  29

CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
 Subject  African-
American
 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
 Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
or Latino
 Pacific
Islander
 White
(not
Hispanic)
 English-Language Arts      76    56    57
 Mathematics      85    47    64
 Science      69        53
 History-Social Science              

CST - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
Subject  Male  Female English
Learners
Economically
Disadvantaged
Students With
Disabilities
Migrant
Education
Services
Yes No Yes No
 English-Language Arts  56  71  19    62  18  68  
 Mathematics  68  67  46    69  29  73  
 Science  56  58      59    65  
 History-Social Science                

Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
Reading and mathematics results from the California Schievement Test, Sixth Edition (CAT-6), the current NRT adopted by the State Board of Education, are reported for each grade level as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. The CAT-6 was adopted in 2003; therefore, no data are reported for 2002. Detailed information regarding results for each grade level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

NRT - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject  School  District  State
 2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004
 Reading  ---  64  62  ---  65  65  ---  43  43
 Mathematics  ---  76  78  ---  71  73  ---  50  51

NRT - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject  African-
American
 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
 Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
or Latino
 Pacific
Islander
 White
(not
Hispanic)
 Reading      64    50    60
 Mathematics      90    62    75

NRT - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject    Male    Female  English
Learners
Economically
Disadvantaged
 Students With
Disabilities
 Migrant
Education
Services
 Yes  No  Yes  No
 Reading  56  71  31    62  29  66  
 Mathematics  79  76  44    78  44  83  

Local Assessment
The District is currently developing a new local assessment system. At this time, the CST and NRT data (see above) is used for program design and instructional purposes.

California Physical Fitness Test
Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

 Grade
Level
 School  District  State
  Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male 
 5  36.0  40.0  33.3  41.3  39.4  43.0  24.8  26.7  22.9
 7        50.2  53.2  47.1  29.1  31.3  27.0
 9              26.3  25.3  27.2

Academic Performance Index (API)

The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet.

Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5 percent of the distance between its Base API and 800. The growth target for a school at or above 800 is to remain at or above 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement. There was no money allocated to the II/USP Program in 2002 or 2003.

Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a schoolwide API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant subgroup in the school (i.e., racial/ethnic subgroups and socioeconomically disadvantaged students). Growth targets, equal to 80 percent of the school's target, are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be eligible for awards.

Percent Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must test at least 95 percent of their students in grades 2-8 and high schools must test at least 90 percent of their students in grades 9-11 on STAR.

Statewide Rank: Schools receiving a Base API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school).

Similar Schools Rank: Schools also receive a ranking that compares that school to 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it.

API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. Detailed information about the API and the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/ or by speaking with the school principal.

Schoolwide API
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2001  2002  2003   From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
From
2003
to 2004
 Percent Tested  100  99  100  Percent Tested  99  100  100
 API Base Score  816  861  852  API Growth Score  855  850  833
 Growth Target  A  A  A  Actual Growth  39  -11  -19
 Statewide Rank  9  10  9  
 Similar Schools Rank  1  10  9

API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2001  2002  2003   From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
From
2003
to 2004
 African-American  African-American
 API Base Score        API Growth Score      
 Growth Target        Actual Growth      
 American Indian or Alaska Native  American Indian or Alaska Native
 API Base Score        API Growth Score      
 Growth Target        Actual Growth      
 Asian  Asian
 API Base Score  893  889  890  API Growth Score  908  886  912
 Growth Target  A  A  A  Actual Growth  15  -3  22
 Filipino  Filipino
 API Base Score        API Growth Score      
 Growth Target        Actual Growth      
 Hispanic or Latino  Hispanic or Latino
 API Base Score        API Growth Score      
 Growth Target        Actual Growth      
 Pacific Islander  Pacific Islander
 API Base Score        API Growth Score      
 Growth Target        Actual Growth      
 White (Not Hispanic)  White (Not Hispanic)
 API Base Score  825  874  862  API Growth Score  867  859  812
 Growth Target  A  A  A  Actual Growth  42  -15  -50

API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2001  2002  2003   From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
From
2003
to 2004
 API Base Score      822  API Growth Score    821  
 Growth Target      A  Actual Growth      

State Award and Intervention Programs
Although state intervention and awards programs are currently in the California Education Code, the programs were not funded for the period addressed by this report. Therefore, there are currently no data available to report.

Federal Intervention Programs
Schools receiving Title I funding enter federal Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for two consecutive years. After entering PI, schools advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Information about PI, including a list of all PI schools, can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/ or by speaking with the school principal.
   School  District
 Year Identified for
 Program Improvement
 ---  ---
 Year in Program
 Improvement
 ---  ---
 Year Exited Program
 Improvement
 ---  ---
 Number of Schools Currently
 in Program Improvement
 ---  0
 Percent of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement
 ---  0.0

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all students perform at or above the proficient level on the state's standards-based assessments by 2014. In order to achieve this goal and meet annual performance objectives, districts and schools must improve each year according to set requirements. A "Yes" in the following table displaying Overall AYP Status indicated that AYP was met for all students and all subgroups, or that exception criteria were met, or that an appeal of the school or district's AYP status was approved. Additional data by subgroup show whether all groups of students in the school and district made the annual measurable objectives for the percent proficient or above and the participation rate required under AYP. Detailed information about AYP can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/ or by speaking with the school principal.

 Overall  School  District
 2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004
 All Students  ---  Yes  Yes  ---  Yes  Yes
 
 Subgroups  School  District
 2002  2003  2004  2002  2003  2004
 All Students  ---  Yes  Yes  ---  Yes  Yes
 African American  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  n/a  n/a
 American Indian or Alaska Native  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  n/a  n/a
 Asian  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  Yes  Yes
 Filipino  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  n/a  n/a
 Hispanic or Latino  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  Yes  Yes
 Pacific Islander  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  n/a  n/a
 White (not Hispanic)  ---  Yes  Yes  ---  Yes  Yes
 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  Yes  n/a
 English Learners  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  n/a  n/a
 Students with Disabilities  ---  n/a  n/a  ---  Yes  Yes

IV. School Completion (Secondary Schools)

   No data are available for this section (Fox is an elementary school)

V. Class Size

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (i.e., number of students), by grade level, as reported by CBEDS.

 Grade  2002  2003  2004
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms  Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms  Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms
 1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+
 K  18.0  2      19.3  3      15.3  3    
 1  19.0  2      18.5  2      19.5  2    
 2  20.0  2      19.5  2      20.0  2    
 3  18.7  3      19.0  3      19.0  2    
 4  27.5    2    27.0    2    26.5    2  
 5  26.5    2    26.5    2    28.5    2  
 6                        
 K-3  19.0  2      19.0  2      19.0  2    
 3-4                        
 4-8                        
 Other                        

Average Teaching Load and Teaching Load Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (i.e., number of students), by subject area, as reported by CBEDS.

       No data are available for this section

Class Size Reduction Participation
California's K-3 Class Size Reduction program began in 1996 for children in kindergarten and grades one through three. Funding is provided to participating school districts to decrease the size of K-3 classes to 20 or fewer students per certificated teacher. Data reported are the percent of students in each grade level in the school that are in a class size reduction classroom.
 Grade Level  Percent of Students Participating
 2002  2003  2004
 K  100%  100%  100%
 1  100%  100%  100%
 2  100%  100%  100%
 3  100%  100%  100%

VI. Teacher and Staff Information

Core Academic Courses Not Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all teachers teaching in core academic subjects are to be "highly qualified" not later than the end of the 2005-06 school year. In general, NCLB requires that each teacher must have: (1) a bachelor's degree, (2) a state credential or an Intern Certificate/Credential for no more than three years, and (3) demonstrated subject matter competence for each core subject to be taught by the teacher. More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found at the California Department of Education's Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.

For a school, the data reported are the percent of a school's classes in core content areas not taught by NCLB compliant teachers. For a district, the data reported are the percent of all classes in core content areas not taught by NCLB compliant teachers in all schools in the district, in high-poverty schools in the district, and in low-poverty schools in the district.

     School      District  
 This School  0.0  ---
 All Schools in District  ---  0.0
 High-Poverty Schools in District  ---  0.0
 Low-Poverty Schools in District  ---  0.0

Teacher Credentials
Data reported are the number of teachers (full-time and part-time) as reported by CBEDS. Each teacher is counted as "1". If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.
     2002      2003      2004  
 Total Teachers
 
 17  18  16
 Teachers with Full Credential
 
 17  18  16
 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area
 (full credential but teaching outside subject area)
 0  0  0
 Teachers in Alternative Routes to Certification
 (district and university internship)
 0  0  0
 Pre-Internship
 
 0  0  0
 Teachers with Emergency Permits
 (not qualified for a credential or internship but meeting minimum requirements)
 0  0  0
 Teachers with Waivers
 (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)
 0  0  0

Teacher Misassignments
Data reported are the number of placements of a certificated employee in a teaching or services position for which the employee does not hold a legally recognized certificate or credential, or the placement of a certificated employee in a teaching or services position that the employee is not otherwise authorized by statute to hold.
     2002      2003      2004  
 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners
 
 ---  --- 0
 Total Teacher Misassignments
 
 ---  --- 0

Teacher Education Level
Data reported are the percent of teachers by education level.
     School      District  
 Doctorate  0.0  0.0
 Master's Degree plus 30 or more semester hours  6.3  8.8
 Master's Degree  31.3  17.5
 Bachelor's Degree plus 30 or more semester hours  62.5  72.3
 Bachelor's Degree  0.0  1.5
 Less than Bachelor's Degree  0.0  0.0

Vacant Teacher Positions
Data reported are the number of positions to which a single designated certificated employee has not been assigned at the beginning of the year for an entire year or, if the position is for a one-semester course, a position to which a single designated certificated employee has not been assigned at the beginning of a semester for an entire semester.
     2002      2003      2004  
 Vacant Teacher Positions
 
 ---  --- 0

Teacher Evaluations

Formal evaluations are done at least once each year for new probationary staff and every other year for permanent staff.

Formal evaluations include an initial conference with the administrator, observations of the teacher in the classroom, and a final evaluation conference. Progress towards meeting District standards for teaching is monitored by both the teacher and the principal.

Substitute Teachers

All substitutes used by Fox School have passed a qualifying examination administered by the State of California . When a teacher is absent from class, a qualified substitute teacher teaches the class. If a substitute is not available, the class is taught by a credentialed district administrator or a teacher without a regular class assignment. Last year, teachers averaged about 2 days of absence per month. This included illness, in-service training, and other leaves.


Counselors and Other Support Staff
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equals one FTE.

 Title    FTE  
 Counselor  
 Librarian .80
 Psychologist .40
 Social Worker  
 Nurse  
 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist  .50
 Resource Specialist (non-teaching)  1.00
 Other  

 

VII. Curriculum and Instruction

School Instruction and Leadership

Course of Study

  • English/Language Arts
  • Mathematics
  • Science
  • History/Social Science
  • Visual and Performing Arts
  • Physical Education
  • Health

Instruction and Support for Special Needs

“Pull-out” programs for students with specialized needs have been scheduled in order to provide an in-depth program for all students.

Support for special needs of students begins with Student Study Teams who, meeting regularly, develop strategies to help students become more successful in school. School resources and services include:

  • Referral for Special Education Assessment
  • English Language Learners Program
  • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) Program
  • SIP (School Improvement Program) funded para-educators
  • Special Education programs
  • School Psychologist services

School Site Leadership

The school’s leadership team, composed of the principal and teachers, promote quality instruction by assessing our instructional program on a regular basis. Program Improvement Activities for the school year were created by all staff after spending time assessing our needs. All areas of the curriculum are addressed. The staff worked with the California Assessment Collaborative on developing standards for assessing student progress in the Visual and Performing Arts. These activities are listed in our School-Based Coordinated Plan. Teachers participate in grade level and school committees, which design and implement strategies for improving instruction for students. Many of our teachers also participate on District committees.

Instructional Staff Qualifications

All teachers are credentialed by the State of California . All Fox teachers have completed graduate work. All substitutes used by Fox School have passed a qualifying examination administered by the State of California . When a teacher is absent from class, a qualified substitute teacher teaches the class. If a substitute is not available, the class is taught by a credentialed district administrator or a teacher without a regular class assignment. Last year, teachers averaged about 2 days of absence per month. This included illness, in-service training, and other leaves.

Student/Teacher Ratio

K - 3 classrooms have a maximum class size of 20 students. 4th through 5th grades are staffed at a ratio of 27 to 1. With rare exceptions, classes do not exceed 28 students in grades 4 and 5.

Professional Development
Staff development activities are determined through a process which begins with the staff identifying needs that are related to the goals identified in the School Improvement Plan. District-wide needs identified through the “Futures” planning process are also incorporated into the plans for staff development. The calendar and topics for staff development conducted on non-student days are identified in the School Improvement Plan each year. Fox School ’s teachers participate in one day of staff development before the students return to school. Three additional staff development days were conducted during the school year and two non-student days were devoted to parent conferences. Some adjusted Wednesdays are also used for staff development.

During these staff development times, teachers received training in:

  1. English Language Arts
  2. Mathematics
  3. Grade Level Teaming
  4. Curriculum Planning for the Year
  5. Physical Education
  6. Curriculum and Instructional Practices
  7. Visual and Performing Arts
  8. Technology
  9. Differentiated Instruction
Individual staff members also participated in additional workshops and training in these areas.

Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

The District has adopted the following textbooks in accordance with State standards.

  • Everyday Math (K-6)
  • Harcourt Brace “Signatures” for English/Language Arts
  • Silver Burdett Music Series
  • Full Option Science System (FOSS)
  • Primarily Health, Health Promotion Wave, Healthy You

The State and District provide regular classroom materials to support our program goals. Enrichment and supplemental materials are purchased through SIP funds and with the help of the Parent Teacher Association. Additionally, the PTA gives money directly to teachers to use for classroom enrichment.

Fox School has an average of one television set and VCR for every three classrooms. There are 2 scanners, four video cameras, a digital camera, and an electronic projection system available for classroom projects. There is a wide variety of software, encyclopedia and reference CD ROMs at the school site, including KidPix®, HyperStudio®, Student Writing Center®, ClarisWorks®, Microsoft Works®, and Microsoft Office®.

The school library contains over 12,500 books.

Availability of Sufficient Standards-Aligned Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials
The availability of sufficient standards-aligned textbooks and other instructional materials for each pupil, including English learners, that are consistent with the content and cycles of the curriculum frameworks adopted by the State Board of Education in the core curriculum areas of reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and history-social science; foreign language and health; and science laboratory equipment for grades 9 to 12, inclusive, as appropriate.

Sufficient standards-aligned textbooks and other instructional  materials were available for each pupil in the school.
 
 

Instructional Minutes
The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.
 Grade
Level
 Instructional Minutes
 Offered  State Requirement
 K  41,800  36,000
 1  51,965  50,400
 2  51,965  50,400
 3  51,965  50,400
 4  54,585  54,000
 5  54,585  54,000

Total Number of Minimum Days

The school has a minimum day each Wednesday. These are used for staff development, staff planning, staff meetings, and conferences. Parent conferences are held twice per year. The total minimum days is 47 (36 + 11).


VIII. Postsecondary Preparation (Secondary Schools)

      No data are available for this section (Fox is an Elementary school)

IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data

County offices of education are not required to report average salaries and expenditures. The California Department of Education's School Fiscal Services Division does not calculate statewide average salary and expenditure information for county offices of education.

Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2002-2003)
Data reported are the district average salary for teachers, principals, and superintendents, compared to the state average salaries for districts of the same type and size, as defined by Education Code Section 41409. Detailed information regarding salaries may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/salaries0203.asp.

 Category  District
Amount
 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category
 Beginning Teacher Salary  $31,641  $35,949
 Mid-Range Teacher Salary  $58,575  $55,680
 Highest Teacher Salary  $75,656  $69,175
 Average Principal Salary (Elementary)  $95,995  $85,767
 Average Principal Salary (Middle)  $100,389  $88,426
 Average Principal Salary (High)    
 Superintendent Salary  $125,600  $118,606
 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries  39.3  42.5
 Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries  7.2  5.9


Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2002-2003)
Data reported are total dollars expended in the district and the dollars expended per student at the district compared to the state average. Detailed information regarding expenditures may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/.

 District  District  State Average
For Districts
In Same Category
 State Average
All Districts
 Total Dollars  Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 $20,100,257  $8,104  $6,542  $6,822


Types of Services Funded (2003-2004)
These services were funded by the district during the 2003-2004 school year.
  • Reg. Ed
  • CSR
  • Guidance
  • Music
  • Summer School
  • Community day school
  • Gov's Perf awards
  • API donations
  • ODE
     

Special Education

  • Psychologists
  • County Sp Ed
  • Speech
  • SP Ed IDEA
  • RSP, SDC & NPS
  • Transportation
  • Teachers
  • Classified Staff
  • Benefits
  • Books & Supplies
  • Services
  • Equipment
  • Health Services
  • Food Services
  • Title I
  • Drug
  • Teacher Quality
  • Title II
  • Title III
  • Title III not LEA
  • Title VI
  • Title VI (CSR)
  • Dist Block Grant
  • NBCT
  • ELLP
  • Classroom Library
  • Public School Library
  • Lottery Prop 20
  • Tolerance Ed
  • School Safety
  • TUPE
  • Arts Ed Partnership
  • EIA
  • Ed. Tech
  • GATE
  • Instructional Materials
  • IMFRP
  • Standards Based
  • Instructional Mat/Staff Buyout
  • Miller Unruh
  • Oracle Grant
  • ACSD Grant
  • SIP