School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2002-2003  

Published During 2003-2004

Notes regarding the source and currency of data:
Data included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ope/sarc/data.htm. Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2002-03 school year or from the two preceding years (2000-01 and 2001-02). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2001-02. A glossary of terms is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/demographics/glossary.
School Information District Information
 School Name  Nesbit Elementary  District Name  Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary
 Principal  Bill McClurg  Superintendent  John McIntosh (Anne Campbell in 2002-2003)
 Street  500 Biddulph Way  Street  2960 Hallmark Dr.
 City, State, Zip  Belmont, CA    94002-2711  City, State, Zip  Belmont, CA    94002-2943
 Phone Number  650-637-4860  Phone Number  650-637-4800
 FAX Number  650-637-4867   FAX Number  650-637-4811
 Web Site  www.belmont.k12.ca.us/main/nesbit/  Web Site  www.belmont.k12.ca.us
 E-mail Address  bmcclurg@belmont.k12.ca.us  E-mail Address  jmcintosh@belmont.k12.ca.us
 CDS Code  41-68866-6043475  SARC Contact Marcia Harter <mharter@belmont.k12.ca.us>

School Description and Mission Statement

Nesbit School, located in the City of Belmont on the peninsula south of San Francisco, is one of five elementary schools in the Belmont- Redwood Shores School District. Students are promoted to the 6th grade at Ralston Middle School, the only middle school in the District.

The Nesbit School community consists of families for whom education is a priority. The school is the hub of the community for many of these parents. Families enthusiastically support the Parent Teacher Association, School Site Council and countless volunteer activities and projects. Pride in Nesbit’s distinguished school recognition was reflected from all members of the school community.

Mission and Goals
Nesbit School's mission is to create educational opportunities with high standards in a nurturing, respectful environment and to develop the full potential of each student in our diverse community.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement

 Contact Person Name   Sherri Sentman  Contact Person Phone Number   650-637-4860
  • Adopt-a-Class
  • Book Fair
  • Candy Cane Lane
  • Classroom field trips (chaperones)
  • Classroom Helpers
  • Classroom supplies
  • Computer education
  • Discovery Day
  • Emergency Preparedness
  • Escrip
  • Family Math
  • 5th grade graduation party
  • Fund Run
  • Hot Lunch Program
  • Library Volunteers
  • Monetary gifts
  • Parent education
  • Parent Teacher Association
  • Project Self Esteem
  • Read Across America
  • Red Ribbon Week
  • TV Turnoff Week

  • I. Demographic Information

    Student Enrollment, by Grade Level
    Data reported are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).
     Grade Level  Enrollment  Grade Level  Enrollment
     Kindergarten 57   Grade 9
     Grade 1 51   Grade 10
     Grade 2 60   Grade 11
     Grade 3 42   Grade 12
     Grade 4 57   Ungraded Secondary
     Grade 5 47     
     Grade 6
     Grade 7
     Grade 8
     Ungraded Elementary  Total Enrollment 314 

    Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
    Data reported are the number and percent of students in each racial/ethnic category as reported by CBEDS.
     Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
    of
    Students
     Percent
    of
    Students
     Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
    of
    Students
     Percent
    of
    Students
     African-American 35  11.1   Hispanic or Latino 50  15.9 
     American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0   Pacific Islander 2.2 
     Asian 45  14.3   White (Not Hispanic) 158  50.3 
     Filipino 2.9   Multiple or No Response 10  3.2 

    II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

    School Safety Plan
     Date of Last Review/Update   August 21, 2002  Date Last Discussed with Staff   August 27, 2002
    Nesbit School has a Comprehensive School Safety Plan in place, which meets all of the requirements of SB 187. The plan is reviewed annually and updated as needed. The plan includes:
    • Emergency response information
    • School maps
    • Roles of personnel
    • Emergency preparedness guidelines
    • Procedures to follow during specified emergencies
    • A management plan
    • First-aid procedures
    Drills are held on a regular basis for fire and earthquake safety. Nesbit's PTA sponsors a drive each year to ensure that each classroom has portable basic emergency supplies.
     

    School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

    School procedures and rules are described in the school handbook that is distributed to parents each September and in Nesbit’s Expectations of Behavior. Students participate in various activities designed to create motivation and offer recognition such as:

    • Book-It
    • Red Ribbon Week
    • Speech and Spelling contests
    • Field trips
    • Outdoor Education
    • D.A.R.E.
    • Winter and Spring concerts
    • Annual 5th grade musical
    • Presidential Academic Fitness awards

    Project Self Esteem is a program presented by teams of parent volunteers in grades K through 4, which helps teach students how to make appropriate choices and to treat themselves and others with respect. Third graders participated in STOP (Students Teaching Other Peers) learning about resiliency and asset building from Ralston Middle School students.

    Students use Conflict Resolution strategies to resolve disagreements.


    Suspensions and Expulsions
    Data reported are the number of suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.
       School  District
     2001
     2002
     2003  2001  2002  2003
     Number of Suspensions
     7
     1
    1
    49
    58
    61
     Rate of Suspensions
      2.14%
    .31% 
    .32%
    1.95
    2.32%
    2.4%
     Number of Expulsions
      1
    0
    6
     Rate of Expulsions
      .31%
      0%
    0%
      .08%
    0%
    .24%

    School Facilities

    Nesbit School has 24 classrooms: 15 classrooms are used for regular instruction and 2 house County programs for Orthopedically Handicapped children. The other classroom(s) and 3 smaller rooms are used for Science, Instrumental and Choral Music and small group instruction in Reading, the English Language Learners Program, Speech and Language, a Special Day Class, and the Resource Specialist Program.

    Every instructional space in our school, including the library, has Internet access and at least one computer with CD ROM. Most classrooms have multiple computers. We have 98 computers for student use, 91 of them with CD ROM.

    Every teacher in the District has a computer for both instruction and classroom management. Every staff member has received technology training. Every staff member is assigned a telephone number and voice mailbox.


    III. Academic Data

    Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
    Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science and history/social science in grades 9-11, and a norm-referenced test, which tests reading, language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in grades 9-11.

    California Standards Tests (CST)
    The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards), Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Detailed information regarding results for each grade and proficiency level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

    CST - All Students
    Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
     Performance Level  School  District  State
     2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
    English Language Arts
     Proficient or Advanced  27  32  31  55  57  58  30  32  35
     Not Tested  6  10  2  6  3  1  6  8  1
    Mathematics
     Proficient or Advanced    32  41    53  59    31  35
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
    Science
     Proficient or Advanced            0    30  27
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
    History/Social Science
     Proficient or Advanced            47    28  28
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

    CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups
    Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
     Performance Level  African-
    American
     American
    Indian or
    Alaska
    Native
     Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
    or Latino
     Pacific
    Islander
     White
    (not
    Hispanic)
    English Language Arts
     Proficient or Advanced  14    57    16    37
     Not Tested  3    0    0    1
    Mathematics
     Proficient or Advanced  17    71    22    50
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
    Science
     Proficient or Advanced              
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
    History/Social Science
     Proficient or Advanced              
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

    CST - Subgroups
    Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
    Performance Level  Male  Female English
    Learners
    Socioeconomically
    Disadvantaged
    Students With
    Disabilities
    Migrant
    Education
    Services
    Yes No Yes No
    English Language Arts
     Proficient or Advanced  27  34  0  3  36  14  34  
     Not Tested  4  0  6  0  2  10  1  
    Mathematics
     Proficient or Advanced  43  40  13  14  46  17  46  
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
    Science
     Proficient or Advanced                
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
    History/Social Science
     Proficient or Advanced                
     Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

    Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
    Reading and mathematics results from the Norm-Referenced Test (NRT), adopted by the State Board of Education (this was the Stanford 9 test up until 2003, but was changed to the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition for 2003), are reported for each grade level as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding results for each grade level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

    NRT - All Students
    Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
    Subject  School  District  State
     2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
     Reading  49  49  35  74  76  65  44  45  43
     Mathematics  58  60  45  75  75  71  53  55  50

    NRT - Racial/Ethnic Groups
    Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
    Subject  African-
    American
     American
    Indian or
    Alaska
    Native
     Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
    or Latino
     Pacific
    Islander
     White
    (not
    Hispanic)
     Reading  28    50    14    42
     Mathematics  27    79    19    56

    NRT - Subgroups
    Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
    Subject    Male    Female  English
    Learners
    Socioeconomically
    Disadvantaged
     Students With
    Disabilities
     Migrant
    Education
    Services
     Yes  No  Yes  No
     Reading  29  41  6  7  40  4  40  
     Mathematics  47  43  13  10  51  20  49  

    Local Assessment
    In the 2002-2003 school year, a new norm reference test, CAT-6, was used to assess student progress. See NRT data (above) for 2002-2003 scores. Three years of data for the previously used California Standards Test is shown in the following table. Data reported are the percent of students meeting or exceeding the district standard which is scoring at or above the 50th NPR.

    CST for 2000-2002: Percentage of students meeting or exceeding the district standard.

     Grade
    Level
     Reading  Writing  Mathematics
     2000
     2001
     2002
     2000
     2001
     2002
     2000
     2001
     2002
     K
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     1
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     2
     57
     43
    50 
     
     
     
     61
     49
     56
     3
     47
     46
    42 
     
     
     
     52
     58
     56
     4
     65
     48
    59 
    69 
    91 
    86 
     59
     67
     70
     5
    66 
     61
    45 
     
     
     
     52
     58
     58

    California Physical Fitness Test
    Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/pe/pe.html. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
     Grade
    Level
     School  District  State
      Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male 
     5  31.3  30.8  31.8  34.9  42.1  29.1  23.1  24.5  21.7
     7        30.9  22.0  38.6  27.2  28.9  25.5
     9              24.2  22.7  25.7

    Academic Performance Index (API)

    The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet.

    Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5 percent of the distance between its Base API and 800. The growth target for a school at or above 800 is to remain at or above 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement. There was no money allocated to the II/USP Program in 2002 or 2003.

    Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a schoolwide API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant subgroup in the school (i.e., racial/ethnic subgroups and socioeconomically disadvantaged students). Growth targets, equal to 80 percent of the school's target, are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be eligible for awards.

    Percent Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must test at least 95 percent of their students in grades 2-8 and high schools must test at least 90 percent of their students in grades 9-11 on STAR.

    Statewide Rank: Schools receiving a Base API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school).

    Similar Schools Rank: Schools also receive a ranking that compares that school to 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it.

    API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. Detailed information about the API and the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/psaa/api/ or by speaking with the school principal.

    Schoolwide API
     API Base Data  API Growth Data
       2000  2001  2002   From
    2000
    to 2001
    From
    2001
    to 2002
    From
    2002
    to 2003
     Percent Tested  100  100  100  Percent Tested  100  100  99
     API Base Score  712  697    API Growth Score  702  726  716
     Growth Target  4  5    Actual Growth  -10  29  -1
     Statewide Rank  7  6    
     Similar Schools Rank  1  1  

    API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups
     API Base Data  API Growth Data
       2000  2001  2002   From
    2000
    to 2001
    From
    2001
    to 2002
    From
    2002
    to 2003
     African-American  African-American
     API Base Score        API Growth Score      
     Growth Target        Actual Growth      
     American Indian or Alaska Native  American Indian or Alaska Native
     API Base Score        API Growth Score      
     Growth Target        Actual Growth      
     Asian  Asian
     API Base Score        API Growth Score      
     Growth Target        Actual Growth      
     Filipino  Filipino
     API Base Score        API Growth Score      
     Growth Target        Actual Growth      
     Hispanic or Latino  Hispanic or Latino
     API Base Score  614  616    API Growth Score  616    633
     Growth Target  3  4    Actual Growth  2    14
     Pacific Islander  Pacific Islander
     API Base Score        API Growth Score      
     Growth Target        Actual Growth      
     White (Not Hispanic)  White (Not Hispanic)
     API Base Score  720  716    API Growth Score  719  738  748
     Growth Target  3  4    Actual Growth  -1  22  8

    API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
     API Base Data  API Growth Data
       2000  2001  2002   From
    2000
    to 2001
    From
    2001
    to 2002
    From
    2002
    to 2003
     API Base Score        API Growth Score      632
     Growth Target        Actual Growth      

    Awards and Intervention Programs
    Eligibility for statewide award or intervention programs is based on API growth data from the previous academic year.
    The Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program was not funded for the year 2002 or 2003.

     School  District
     Federal Programs  2001  2002  2003  Federal Programs  2001  2002  2003
     Recognition for
     Achievement (Title 1)
     No  No  No  Number of Schools Identified
     for Program Improvement
     0  0  0
     Identified for Program
     Improvement (Title 1)
     No  No  No  Percent of Schools Identified
     for Program Improvement
     0.0  0.0  0.0
     Exited Title 1 Program
     Improvement
     No  No  No  
     Years Identified for
     Program Improvement
         
     California Programs  2001  2002  2003
     Eligible for Governor's
     Performance Award
     No  Yes  N/A
     
     Eligible for II/USP
     No  ---  ---
     
     Applied for II/USP Funding
     No  ---  ---
     
     Received II/USP Funding
     No  ---  ---

    Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
    The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all students perform at or above the proficient level on the state's standards-based assessments by 2014. In order to achieve this goal and meet annual performance objectives, districts and schools must improve each year according to set requirements. Data reported show whether all groups of students in the school made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Detailed information about AYP can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp/ or by speaking with the school principal.
     Groups  School  District
     2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
     All Students  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
     African American  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
     American Indian or Alaska Native  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
     Asian  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
     Filipino  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
     Hispanic or Latino  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
     Pacific Islander  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
     White (not Hispanic)  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
     Socioeconomically Disadvantaged  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
     English Learners  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
     Students with Disabilities  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes

    IV. School Completion (Secondary Schools)

    California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)
    Beginning with the graduating class of 2006, students in California public schools will have to pass the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) to receive a high school diploma. The School Accountability Report Card for that year will report the percent of students completing grade 12 who successfully completed the CAHSEE.
    These data are not required to be reported until 2006 when they can be reported for the entire potential graduating class. When implemented, the data will be disaggregated by special education status, English language learners, socioeconomic status, gender, and ethnic group.


    Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate
    Data reported regarding progress toward reducing dropout rates over the most recent three-year period include: grade 9-12 enrollment, the number of dropouts, and the one-year dropout rate as reported by CBEDS. The formula for the one-year dropout rate is (Grades 9-12 Dropouts divided by Grades 9-12 Enrollment) multiplied by 100. The graduation rate, required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), is calculated by dividing the number of high school graduates by the sum of dropouts for grades 9 through 12, in consecutive years, plus the number of graduates.

    V. Class Size

    Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution
    Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each category (i.e., number of students), by grade level, as reported by CBEDS.

     Grade  2001  2002  2003
     Avg.
    Class
    Size
    Number of Classrooms  Avg.
    Class
    Size
    Number of Classrooms  Avg.
    Class
    Size
    Number of Classrooms
     1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+
     K  18.67  3      19.67  3      19.00  3    
     1  18.50  2      20.00  3      16.33  3    
     2  20.00  3      18.50  2      19.67  3    
     3  18.67  3      19.67  3      20.00  2    
     4  27.50    2    23.50    2    28.00    2  
     5  27.00    2    27.00    2    23.00    2  
     6                        
     K-3                        
     3-4                        
     4-8                        
     Other                        

    Average Teaching Load and Teaching Load Distribution
    Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (i.e., number of students), by subject area as reported by CBEDS.

           No data are available for this section

    Class Size Reduction Participation
    California's K-3 Class Size Reduction program began in 1996 for children in kindergarten and grades one through three. Funding is provided to participating school districts to decrease the size of K-3 classes to 20 or fewer students per certificated teacher. Data reported are the percent of students in each grade level in the school that are in a class size reduction classroom.
     Grade Level  Percent of Students Participating
     2001  2002  2003
     K  100%  100%  100%
     1  100%  100%  100%
     2  100%  100%  100%
     3  100%  100%  100%


    VI. Teacher and Staff Information

    Teacher Credentials
    Data reported are the number of teachers (full-time and part-time). Each teacher is counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.

         2001      2002      2003  
     Total Teachers
     
     20  18  19
     Teachers with Full Credential
     (full credential and teaching in subject area)
     20  18  19
     Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area
     (full credential but teaching outside subject area)
         
     Teachers with Emergency Credential
     (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns, and Emergency Permits)
         
     Teachers with Waivers
     (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)
         

    Highly Qualified Teachers
    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires local educational agencies (LEAs) to report specific data regarding highly qualified teachers. As of December of 2003, the State Board of Education (SBE) had not approved a definition for use in reporting data pertaining to highly qualified teachers. Therefore, the requirement that LEAs include these data will not apply to reports published during the 2003-04 school year.
    The State Board of Education is scheduled to approve a definition for "highly qualified teacher" in 2004. Once approved, LEAs will be required to use the definition to provide data on report cards published during the 2004-05 school year.

    Teacher Evaluations

    Formal evaluations are done at least once each year for new probationary staff and every other year for permanent staff.

    Formal evaluations include an initial conference with the administrator, observations of the staff member, and a final evaluation conference. Progress towards meeting District standard is monitored by both the employee and the principal.


    Substitute Teachers
    All substitutes used by Nesbit School have passed a qualifying examination administered by the State of California. When a teacher is absent from class, a qualified substitute teacher teaches the class. If a substitute is not available, the class is taught by a credentialed district administrator or a teacher without a regular class assignment. Last year, teachers averaged about 1 day of absence per month. This included illness, in-service training, and other leaves. 

    Counselors and Other Support Staff
    Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equals one FTE.

     Title    FTE  
     Band/Strings/Vocal Music Teacher  .4
     Counselor  
     Gifted and Talented Education Teacher (GATE)  .10
     Librarian  .80
     Psychologist  .2
     Social Worker  
     Nurse  
     Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist  .50
     Resource Specialist (teaching)  1.0
     Reading Teacher  .50
     Special Day Class Teacher  1.0
     Science Teacher (4th and 5th grades)  .50
     Other (Title I Teacher)  1.0

    VII. Curriculum and Instruction

    School Instruction and Leadership
    Course of Study
    • English/Language Arts
    • Mathematics
    • Science
    • History/Social Science
    • Visual and Performing Arts
    • Physical Education
    • Health
    Instruction and Support for Special Needs

    Support for special needs of students begins with Student Success Teams comprised of parents, teachers, specialists, and administrators, who meet regularly to develop strategies to help students become more successful in school. They coordinate school resources and services which may include:

    • Resource Specialist Program
    • English Language Learners Program
    • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) Program
    • Group and Family Counseling referrals
    • Speech & Language services
    • Special Day Class
    • Miller-Unruh Reading Specialist
    • School Psychologist services
    • Title I program

    School Site Leadership

    Nesbit teachers have been recognized by the San Mateo County Kent awards for special achievement. Paul Ternullo, June Irhazy, Sally Burgess, and John DaBaldo have been recognized for their integrated activities in the arts. Gina O’Neal was cited for her exceptional work with inclusion students. Marilyn Schwarz, a community volunteer, was honored for her 3rd grade music program in 2002. Teachers also serve on district wide curriculum committees, as mentor teachers responsible for staff training, and as master teachers for college students.

    Instructional Staff Qualifications

    All teachers are credentialed by the State of California. All Nesbit teachers have completed graduate work.

    All substitutes used by Nesbit School have passed a qualifying examination administered by the State of California. When a teacher is absent from class, a qualified substitute teacher teaches the class. If a substitute is not available, the class is taught by a credentialed district administrator or a teacher without a regular class assignment. Last year, teachers averaged about 1 day of absence per month. This included illness, in-service training, and other leaves.

    Student/Teacher Ratio

    Classrooms have a maximum class size of 20 students in Kindergarten through 3rd grade. During 2002-2003, K - 3rd grades were staffed at a ratio of 19.1 to 1. With rare exceptions, classes do not exceed 28 students in grades 4 and 5.

    Through SIP and Title I funds, instructional assistants were provided for all classrooms. Further assistance is provided by parent volunteers in the classroom. They help with small group and individual instruction in various content areas. Three tutors from the College of Notre Dame also work with small groups of students through the America Reads program.


    Professional Development

    Staff development activities are determined through a process which begins with the staff identifying needs that are related to the goals identified in the School Improvement Plan. District-wide needs identified through the “Futures” planning process are also incorporated into the plans for staff development. The calendar and topics for staff development conducted on non-student days are identified in the School Improvement Plan each year. Nesbit School’s teachers participate in one day of staff development before the students return to school. Two additional staff development days were conducted during the school year. Students are dismissed early on Wednesdays to provide teachers with opportunities for collaborative planning, grade level articulation, and other training.

    During staff development times, teachers received training in:

    1. English Language Arts
    2. Mathematics
    3. Grade Level Teaming
    4. Curriculum Planning for the Year
    5. Special Education
    6. Curriculum and Instructional Practices
    7. Standards and Assessment

    Individual staff members also participated in off-site workshops and training of their choice in order to keep abreast of educational research and increase knowledge and skill in curricular areas.


    Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

     The District has adopted the following textbooks in accordance with State standards.:

    • EverydayMath (K-5)
    • Harcourt Brace “Signatures” for English/Language Arts
    • Rebecca Sitton Sourcebook for spelling
    • Harcourt Brace “Social Studies 2000” (grades K-2) for History/Social Science
    • McGraw Hill “Adventures in Time and Place” (grades 3-5) for History/Social Science
    • Silver Burdett Music Series
    • Full Option Science System (FOSS)
    • Skills for School Success (grades 4 and 5)

    The State and District provide regular classroom materials to support our program goals. Enrichment and supplemental materials are purchased through SIP funds and with the help of the Parent Teacher Association. Additionally, the PTA gives money directly to teachers to use for classroom enrichment.

    Every classroom at Nesbit School is equipped with a television, VCR, and 1 to 6 Internet connected student computers and printers. There are three scanners, five digital cameras, a multimedia presentation projector, and one video camera available on campus for student and teacher use. Each teacher has a computer workstation as well. Eleven classrooms are equipped with an FM amplification system. There is a wide variety of software, encyclopedia and reference CD ROMs at the school site, including KidPix®, HyperStudio®, Student Writing Center ®, ClarisWorks®, Microsoft Works®, and Microsoft Office®.

    The entire school library collection of over 8,000 books is electronically catalogued. In addition, the library contains a mini-lab consisting of 5 computers, a scanner, and two printers.


    Instructional Minutes
    The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.
     Grade
    Level
     Instructional Minutes
     Offered  State Requirement
     K  43,695  36,000
     1  51,273  50,400
     2  51,273  50,400
     3  51,273  50,400
     4  54,598  54,000
     5  54,598  54,000

    Total Number of Minimum Days
    The school scheduled 10 minimum days during the school year to conduct parent conferences at the end of the Fall and Spring trimesters. In addition, each Wednesday during the school year is a minimum day for students. Wednesday afternoons are used for staff development, curriculum planning, and grade level meetings. The last day of school in June is also a minimum day. Total minimum days: 47 (10 + 36 + 1)


    VIII. Postsecondary Preparation (Secondary Schools)

    No data are available for this section (Nesbit is an Elementary school)


    IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data

    Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
    Data reported are the district average salary for teachers, principals, and superintendents, compared to the state average salaries for districts of the same type and size, as defined by Education Code Section 41409. The district average principal salary is shown separately for elementary, middle, and high schools, but the state average principal salary is combined.

     Category  District
    Amount
     State Average
    For Districts
    In Same Category
     Beginning Teacher Salary  30267  35371
     Mid-Range Teacher Salary  56030  55531
     Highest Teacher Salary  68000  67900
     Average Principal Salary (Elementary)  89363  83242
     Average Principal Salary (Middle)  94604
     Average Principal Salary (High)  
     Superintendent Salary  110863  115103
     Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries  43.64  42.96
     Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries  7.87  6.17

    Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
    Data reported are total dollars expended in the district, and the dollars expended per student at the district compared to the state average. Detailed information regarding expenditures may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fiscal/financial/.
     District  District  State Average
    For Districts
    In Same Category
     State Average
    All Districts
     Total Dollars  Dollars per Student
    (ADA)
     Dollars per Student
    (ADA)
     Dollars per Student
    (ADA)
     $16355026  $6742  $6444  $6719


    Types of Services Funded (2002-2003)
    • Reg. Ed
    • CSR
    • Guidance
    • Music
    • Summer School
    • Community day school
    • Gov's Perf awards
    • API donations
    • ODE
       

    Special Education

    • Psychologists
    • County Sp Ed
    • Speech
    • SP Ed IDEA
    • RSP, SDC & NPS
    • Transportation
    • Teachers
    • Classified Staff
    • Benefits
    • Books & Supplies
    • Services
    • Equipment
    • Health Services
    • Food Services
    • Title I
    • Drug
    • Teacher Quality
    • Title II
    • Title III
    • Title VI
    • Title VI (CSR)
    • Dist Block Grant
    • NBCT
    • ELLP
    • Classroom Library
    • Public School Library
    • Lottery Prop 20
    • Tolerance Ed
    • School Safety
    • TUPE
    • Arts Ed Partnership
    • EIA
    • Ed. Tech
    • GATE
    • Instructional Materials
    • IMFRP
    • Standards Based
    • Instructional Mat/Staff Buyout
    • Miller Unruh
    • Oracle Grant
    • ACSD Grant
    • SIP