School Accountability Report Card
Reported for School Year 2002-2003 Published During 2003-2004 |
| Notes regarding the source and currency of
data: Data included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ope/sarc/data.htm. Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2002-03 school year or from the two preceding years (2000-01 and 2001-02). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2001-02. A glossary of terms is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/demographics/glossary. |
| School Information |
District Information |
||
| School Name |
Central Elementary |
District Name |
Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary |
| Principal |
Cori McKenzie |
Superintendent |
John McIntosh (Anne Campbell in 2002-2003) |
| Street |
525 Middle Road |
Street |
2960 Hallmark Dr. |
| City, State, Zip |
Belmont, CA 94002-2130 |
City, State, Zip |
Belmont, CA 94002-2943 |
| Phone Number |
650-637-4820 |
Phone Number |
650-637-4800 |
| FAX Number |
650-637-4827 |
FAX Number |
650-637-4811 |
| Web Site |
Web Site |
||
| Email Address |
Email Address |
||
| CDS Code |
41-68866-6043434 |
SARC Contact |
|
Central School, located in the City of Belmont on the peninsula south of San Francisco, is one of five elementary schools in the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District. Students are promoted to the 6th grade at Ralston Middle School, the only middle school in the District. The Central School community consists of families for whom education is a high priority. The school is the hub of the community for many of these families. Parents enthusiastically support the Parent Teacher Association, School Site Council and countless volunteer activities and projects. Pride in Central's distinguished school recognition was reflected from all members of the school community. The mission of Central School is to provide our students with a high quality educational environment in which students, staff, and parents emphasize excellence: This mission was acknowledged as successful by the State of California when, in 1995, they recognized Central School as a "California Distinguished School". Staff, parents, and students are a community of learners who share this vision. Our vision is the unifying factor in setting each year's educational priorities. The principal facilitates the staff and SSC (School Site Council) to collaboratively plan the curriculum to reflect the school's goals. Throughout the school year student performance is measured against the vision. Student learning outcomes are the primary factors used to measure progress. These goals are carried out by staff who are committed to substantive progress and continuous improvement. |
Opportunities
for Parental Involvement
| Contact Person Name |
Pat Branscum |
Contact Person Phone Number |
650-596-8982 |
|
|
||
I.
Demographic Information
Student
Enrollment, by Grade Level
Data reported
are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California
Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).
| Grade Level | Enrollment | Grade Level | Enrollment |
| Kindergarten | 45 | Grade 9 | 0 |
| Grade 1 | 67 | Grade 10 | 0 |
| Grade 2 | 40 | Grade 11 | 0 |
| Grade 3 | 47 | Grade 12 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 59 | Ungraded Secondary | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 54 | ||
| Grade 6 | 0 | ||
| Grade 7 | 0 | ||
| Grade 8 | 0 | ||
| Ungraded Elementary | 0 | Total Enrollment | 312 |
| Racial/Ethnic Category | Number of Students |
Percent of Students |
Racial/Ethnic Category | Number of Students |
Percent of Students |
| African-American | 7 | 2.2 | Hispanic or Latino | 24 | 7.7 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 | 0.3 | Pacific Islander | 5 | 1.6 |
| Asian | 48 | 15.4 | White (Not Hispanic) | 219 | 70.2 |
| Filipino | 8 | 2.6 | Multiple or No Response | 0 | 0.0 |
II. School Safety and Climate for
Learning
School Safety
Plan
| Date of Last Review/Update |
4/03 |
Date Last Discussed with Staff |
5/03 |
| Emergency Procedures A text version of the emergency safety procedures is available on the web site. It is recommended that you give a copy of these procedures to those you have designated as emergency contacts on your child's emergency card. Disaster Preparedness In case of a disaster, all children will either "duck and cover" and then evacuate the building, or evacuate immediately depending on the crisis. Each teacher will stay with his/her class until all parents or designees pick up the children. If safe, we will return to the building to wait inside, otherwise we will remain outside.
For your information, we have a complete Emergency Response Plan available in our office. You are welcome to come in and review it at anytime. Central School's parent / staff Emergency Committee continually works toward improving student safety. In the past few years a "Kid's Preparedness Kit" concept was developed as a way for parents to participate in preparing our students in the event of a natural disaster or emergency during school hours. The students bring a completed Emergency Release card, along with specific snacks, which are stored by class in the emergency shed. The goal is to provide comfort and sustenance for students in time of an emergency. At the end of each year, the school enjoys the snacks at a Disaster-Free picnic. The committee has also inventoried all items needed in case of an emergency and purchased those items lacking. An Emergency Preparedness flip chart for each classroom was developed for teachers to refer to in case of an emergency. Each classroom also has a First Aid kit, which is used by the teacher in case of an emergency. The committee has recently reviewed and edited Central's Disaster Preparedness Plan. The Emergency committee is an integral part of Central's ongoing efforts towards excellence in student safety and preparedness. |
|||
School Programs
and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment
| Students at Central are positive, enthusiastic learners. The desire and love of learning are hallmarks for the children who attend school here. Parent and community volunteers help us to be assured that no child has an unanswered question or need. Friends of Central, our parent-tutoring program, provides one-to-one assistance from parent volunteers on a weekly basis to students who are struggling. Homework Club, an after-school academic assistance program for students, strives to improve student grades and provide a safe learning environment for after schoolwork. Central has established a Culture of Courtesy by focusing on creating an atmosphere of civility and to build a more caring and compassionate community.
Objectives and activities are planned in grade level meetings by the staff that works well together to assure the success of all students. Our collegiality and the richness gained from shared thought is one important factor enriching the learning environment. Technology became an important part of the school due to Net Day and our work with the Challenge 2000 grant. Project based learning through multimedia presentations became learning activities for children. The use of computers in both the lab and classroom enabled students to word process, draw, and seek information. Classroom teachers work with itinerant teachers to offer children of all ability levels and with a variety of needs programs such as RSP, Speech and Language. These programs assure us that all children achieve at their highest levels. |
Suspensions and
Expulsions
Data reported are the number of
suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a
suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total
number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by
CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a
particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average
may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the
district-wide average for the same type of school.
| School | District | |||||
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| Number of Suspensions |
6 |
12 |
4 |
49 |
58 |
61 |
| Rate of Suspensions |
1.63% |
3.46% |
1.28% |
1.95 |
2.32% |
2.4% |
| Number of Expulsions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
| Rate of Expulsions |
0% |
0% |
0% |
.08% |
0% |
.24%
|
School Facilities
| Central School has 18 classrooms: Fourteen classrooms are used for regular instruction. The other classrooms are used for a 4/5-science lab; the Reading Specialist classroom, Physical Education classes, and a room for individualized tutoring and instruction. The Computer Lab has 22 computers networked to two printers, a Smart Board and a projector. The library has 2 student/teacher computers and 1 librarian computer. There are teacher computer stations with printers in every room. The classroom computers are connected to TV monitors so that lessons can be projected from the computer to TV screen. Classrooms also have between 2 and 5 computers in them, all of which are connected to the Internet. Every staff member has received mandated technology training. All classrooms have telephones. Each staff member has email and voice mailbox. Portables have been made available for childcare services provided by a private agency. Before and after school care provides supervision for students in K-5 five days per week as well as all day on 7 district in-service days and some holidays. |
III. Academic Data
Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting
(STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject
areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in
English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science and history/social
science in grades 9-11, and a norm-referenced test, which tests reading,
language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in
grades 9-11.
California Standards Tests
(CST)
The California Standards Tests (CST)
show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards.
Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels
are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards),
Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and
Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient
or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Detailed
information regarding results for each grade and proficiency level can be found
at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with
the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown
when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
CST - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or
advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.
For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent
not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
| Performance Level | School | District | State | ||||||
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| English Language Arts | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 62 | 60 | 66 | 55 | 57 | 58 | 30 | 32 | 35 |
| Not Tested | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 1 |
| Mathematics | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 63 | 65 | 53 | 59 | 31 | 35 | |||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Science | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 0 | 30 | 27 | ||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| History/Social Science | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 47 | 28 | 28 | ||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Performance Level | African- American |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
Asian | Filipino | Hispanic or Latino |
Pacific Islander |
White (not Hispanic) | ||
| English Language Arts | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 82 | 50 | 64 | ||||||
| Not Tested | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Mathematics | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 79 | 50 | 64 | ||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||
| Science | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | |||||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||
| History/Social Science | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | |||||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||
| Performance Level | Male | Female | English Learners |
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged |
Students
With Disabilities |
Migrant Education Services | |||
| Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||||
| English Language Arts | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 65 | 67 | 66 | 41 | 69 | ||||
| Not Tested | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Mathematics | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | 65 | 64 | 65 | 24 | 69 | ||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Science | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | |||||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| History/Social Science | |||||||||
| Proficient or Advanced | |||||||||
| Not Tested | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| Reading | 77 | 81 | 68 | 74 | 76 | 65 | 44 | 45 | 43 |
| Mathematics | 83 | 85 | 79 | 75 | 75 | 71 | 53 | 55 | 50 |
| Subject | African- American |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
Asian | Filipino | Hispanic or Latino |
Pacific Islander |
White (not Hispanic) |
| Reading | 73 | 56 | 71 | ||||
| Mathematics | 88 | 63 | 79 |
| Subject | Male | Female | English Learners |
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged |
Students
With Disabilities |
Migrant Education Services | ||
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||
| Reading | 67 | 69 | 68 | 47 | 70 | |||
| Mathematics | 83 | 75 | 79 | 41 | 83 | |||
CST for 2000-2002: Percentage of students meeting or exceeding the district standard.
| Grade Level |
Reading | Writing | Mathematics | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | |
| K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
83 |
86 |
86 |
|
|
|
80 |
84 |
76 |
| 3 |
83 |
73 |
86 |
87 |
91 |
78 |
91 |
86 |
91 |
| 4 |
77 |
78 |
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
81 |
82 |
| 5 |
80 |
72 |
76 |
|
|
|
84 |
83 |
89 |
California Physical Fitness Test
Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards
(scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed
information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the
California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/pe/pe.html.
Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of
students tested is 10 or less.
| Grade Level |
School | District | State | ||||||
| Total | Female | Male | Total | Female | Male | Total | Female | Male | |
| 5 | 41.5 | 40.9 | 41.9 | 34.9 | 42.1 | 29.1 | 23.1 | 24.5 | 21.7 |
| 7 | 30.9 | 22.0 | 38.6 | 27.2 | 28.9 | 25.5 | |||
| 9 | 24.2 | 22.7 | 25.7 | ||||||
| API Base Data | API Growth Data | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | From 2000 to 2001 |
From 2001 to 2002 |
From 2002 to 2003 | ||
| Percent Tested | 100 | 100 | 100 | Percent Tested | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| API Base Score | 836 | 843 | 841 | API Growth Score | 848 | 851 | 854 |
| Growth Target | # | A | A | Actual Growth | 12 | 8 | 13 |
| Statewide Rank | 9 | 9 | 9 | ||||
| Similar Schools Rank | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| API Base Data | API Growth Data | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | From 2000 to 2001 |
From 2001 to 2002 |
From 2002 to 2003 | ||
| African-American | African-American | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | American Indian or Alaska Native | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| Asian | Asian | ||||||
| API Base Score | 895 | API Growth Score | 895 | ||||
| Growth Target | A | Actual Growth | 0 | ||||
| Filipino | Filipino | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| Hispanic or Latino | Hispanic or Latino | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| Pacific Islander | Pacific Islander | ||||||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | ||||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| White (Not Hispanic) | White (Not Hispanic) | ||||||
| API Base Score | 847 | 852 | 837 | API Growth Score | 858 | 845 | 853 |
| Growth Target | # | A | A | Actual Growth | 11 | -7 | 16 |
| API Base Data | API Growth Data | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | From 2000 to 2001 |
From 2001 to 2002 |
From 2002 to 2003 | ||
| API Base Score | API Growth Score | 892 | |||||
| Growth Target | Actual Growth | ||||||
| School | District | ||||||
| Federal Programs | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | Federal Programs | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
| Recognition
for Achievement (Title 1) |
No | No | No | Number of Schools
Identified for Program Improvement |
0 | 0 | 0 |
| Identified for
Program Improvement (Title 1) |
No | No | No | Percent of Schools
Identified for Program Improvement |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Exited Title 1
Program Improvement |
No | No | No | ||||
| Years Identified
for Program Improvement |
|||||||
| California Programs | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||
| Eligible for
Governor's Performance Award |
Yes | No | No | ||||
| Eligible for II/USP |
No | --- | --- | ||||
| Applied for II/USP Funding |
No | --- | --- | ||||
| Received II/USP Funding |
No | --- | --- | ||||
| Groups | School | District | ||||
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| All Students | --- | --- | Yes | --- | --- | Yes |
| African American | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | N/A |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | N/A |
| Asian | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | Yes |
| Filipino | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | N/A |
| Hispanic or Latino | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | Yes |
| Pacific Islander | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | N/A |
| White (not Hispanic) | --- | --- | Yes | --- | --- | Yes |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | --- | --- | Yes | --- | --- | Yes |
| English Learners | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | N/A |
| Students with Disabilities | --- | --- | N/A | --- | --- | Yes |
| These data are not required to be reported until 2006 when they can be reported for the entire potential graduating class. When implemented, the data will be disaggregated by special education status, English language learners, socioeconomic status, gender, and ethnic group. |
| Grade | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||||||
| Avg. Class Size |
Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size |
Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size |
Number of Classrooms | |||||||
| 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | ||||
| K | 20.00 | 2 | 20.00 | 3 | 18.00 | 3 | ||||||
| 1 | 20.00 | 2 | 19.50 | 2 | 19.00 | 3 | ||||||
| 2 | 19.33 | 3 | 20.00 | 2 | 20.00 | 2 | ||||||
| 3 | 19.33 | 3 | 19.67 | 3 | 15.67 | 3 | ||||||
| 4 | 28.00 | 2 | 28.00 | 2 | 16.50 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 24.50 | 2 | 24.33 | 3 | 27.00 | 3 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||
| K-3 | 20.00 | 1 | 20.00 | 1 | 19.00 | 1 | ||||||
| 3-4 | ||||||||||||
| 4-8 | 28.00 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||
| Grade Level | Percent of Students Participating | ||
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| K | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| Total
Teachers |
19 | 21 | 20 |
| Teachers with Full
Credential (full credential and teaching in subject area) |
19 | 20 | 19 |
| Teachers Teaching Outside
Subject Area (full credential but teaching outside subject area) |
|||
| Teachers with Emergency
Credential (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns, and Emergency Permits) |
1 | 1 | |
| Teachers with
Waivers (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit) |
Highly Qualified Teachers
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires local educational agencies (LEAs) to report specific data regarding highly qualified teachers. As of December of 2003, the State Board of Education (SBE) had not approved a definition for use in reporting data pertaining to highly qualified teachers. Therefore, the requirement that LEAs include these data will not apply to reports published during the 2003-04 school year.
| The State Board of Education is scheduled to approve a definition for "highly qualified teacher" in 2004. Once approved, LEAs will be required to use the definition to provide data on report cards published during the 2004-05 school year. |
Teacher Evaluations
| Formal evaluations are done at least once each year for new probationary staff and every other year for permanent staff. Formal evaluations include an initial conference with the administrator, observations of the teacher in the classroom, and a final evaluation conference. Progress towards meeting California Standards for the Teaching Profession is monitored by both the teacher and the principal. This year Central is piloting a new teacher evaluation instrument aligned with the California Standards. |
Substitute Teachers
| All substitutes used by Central School have passed a qualifying examination administered by the State of California. When a teacher is absent from class, a qualified substitute teacher teaches the class. If a substitute is not available, a credentialed district administrator or a teacher without a regular class assignment teaches the class. Last year, teachers averaged about 1.7 days of absence per month. This included illness, in-service training, and other leaves. |
Counselors and Other Support Staff
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100% full time. Two staff persons working 50% of full time also equals one FTE.
| Title |
FTE |
| Librarian (Media Tech.) |
.625 |
| Psychologist |
.3 |
| Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist |
.5 |
| Resource Specialist (non-teaching) |
.375 |
| Inclusion aide and Paraprofessionals |
1.75 |
| Title | FTE |
| Counselor | |
| Librarian | |
| Psychologist | 1 |
| Social Worker | |
| Nurse | |
| Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist | 1 |
| Resource Specialist (non-teaching) | |
| Other |
VII. Curriculum and Instruction
School Instruction and Leadership
| Course of Study
Instruction and Support for Special Needs "Pull-out" programs for students with specialized needs have been scheduled in order to provide an in-depth program for all students. Support for special needs of students begins with Student Study Teams who, meeting regularly, develop strategies to help students become more successful in school. They coordinate school resources and services which include:
The principal oversees various projects at Central, but often these activities are lead by various members of the staff and community. A mentor teacher, this year in art, in-services staff regularly on inspirational activities for students based on her own expertise and additional training she is offered due to her position. Other teachers assume leadership on various site and district committees addressing such things as technology, curriculum, assessment, attendance, ecology and others. The staff works together in shared decision making, particularly in the area of curriculum. Any faculty member or someone from the Site Leadership Committee may facilitate these meetings. This committee is composed of a representative from each grade level. School Site Council is another opportunity for staff and community to work together on issues concerning school programs. PTA is an organization of about 20 committee chairs who provide beneficial programs for both students and parents. |
Professional Development
| Staff development activities are determined through a process, which begins with the staff identifying needs that are related to the goals identified in the School Improvement Plan. District-wide needs identified through the "Futures" planning process are also incorporated into the plans for staff development. The calendar and topics for staff development conducted on non-student days are identified in the School Improvement Plan each year. Central School's teachers participate in two days of staff development before the students return to school. Six additional staff development days were conducted during the school year. Two of the non-student days were devoted to parent conferences. During these staff development days, teachers received training in:
Individual staff members also participated in additional workshops and training in these areas. |
Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials
| The District has adopted the following textbooks in accordance with State standards.
The State and District provide regular classroom materials to support our program goals. Enrichment and supplemental and reference CD ROMs at the school site, including Adobe PageMaker®, Adobe PhotoDeluxe®, HyperStudio®, StudentWriting Center®, Adobe Premiere ®, ClarisWorks®, Microsoft Works®, and Microsoft Office® (with Microsoft PowerPoint®) are purchased through SIP funds and with the help of the Parent Teacher Association. Accelerated Reader, a reading tool to motivate students was recently purchased to use with students in grades 1-5. Additionally, the PTA gives money directly to teachers to use for classroom enrichment. Central School has an average of one television set and VCR for every two classrooms. Six digital and video cameras, four scanners and five CD burners are also available for use throughout the school. There is a wide variety of software, including Kid Pix, Microsoft Word Power Point, Storybook Weaver and Excel, Zoophonics, Math Blaster, Treasure Math Storm, Reader Rabbit, Type to Learn and other software used to reinforce classroom skills. The library contains over 9,000 books including fiction and non-fiction, picture books, student-generated works, reference books, art prints, and an educational video library. Students and staff for presentations and for instruction use a computer projection system. |
Total Number of Minimum Days
| The school held 36 minimum days on Wednesdays plus 11 minimum days, for parent conferences conducted at the end of the Fall and Spring Progress Report periods. The remaining days were devoted to grade level teaming and staff in-service. |
Instructional
Minutes
The California Education
Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for
each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered
at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.
| Grade Level |
Instructional Minutes | |
| Offered | State Requirement | |
| K | 38,800 | 36,000 |
| 1 | 51,375 | 50,400 |
| 2 | 51,375 | 50,400 |
| 3 | 51,375 | 50,400 |
| 4 | 54,700 | 54,000 |
| 5 | 54,700 | 54,000 |
| Category | District Amount |
State Average For Districts In Same Category |
| Beginning Teacher Salary | 30267 | 35371 |
| Mid-Range Teacher Salary | 56030 | 55531 |
| Highest Teacher Salary | 68000 | 67900 |
| Average Principal Salary (Elementary) | 89363 | 83242 |
| Average Principal Salary (Middle) | 94604 | |
| Average Principal Salary (High) | ||
| Superintendent Salary | 110863 | 115103 |
| Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries | 43.64 | 42.96 |
| Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries | 7.87 | 6.17 |
| District District State Average For Districts In Same Category |
State Average All Districts |
| Total Dollars Dollars per Student (ADA) Dollars per Student (ADA) |
Dollars per Student (ADA) |
| $16355026 $6742 $6444 | $6719 |
Special Education
|
|
|